Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

7

8. Hayward Industries manufactures dining chairs and tables. The following information is available: Dining ChairsTablesTotal Co

st Machine setups200600$48,000 Inspections250470$72,000 Labor hours2,6002,400 Hayward is considering switching from one overhead rate based on labor hours to activity-based costing. Instructions Perform the following analyses for these two components of overhead: a.Compute total machine setups and inspection costs assigned to each product, using a single overhead rate. b.Compute total machine setups and inspection costs assigned to each product, using activity-based costing. c.Comment on your findings.

1 answer:

Contact [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Instructions are listed below.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Dining Chairs - Tables - Total cost

Machine setups: 200 - 600 - $48,000

Inspections: 250 - 470 - $72,000

Labor hours: 2,600 - 2,400

A) A single overhead rate:

To calculate the estimated manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= (48,000 + 72,000) / (2,600 + 2,400)= $24 per direct labor hour

Now, we can allocate overhead based on direct labor hours:

Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base

Dining Chairs:

Allocated MOH= 24*2,600= $62,400

Tables:

Allocated MOH= 24*2,400= $57,600

B) We have to calculate an overhead rate for each activity cost pool.

<u>Overhead rate:</u>

Machine setups:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 48,000/800= $60 per machine hour set up

Inspections:

Estimated manufacturing overhead rate= 72,000/ 720= $100 per inspection

Based on the overhead rate, we can allocate overhead to each product.

Dining chairs:

Allocated MOH= 60* 200 + 100*250= $37,000

Tables:

Allocated MOH= 60*600 + 100*470= $83,000

C) We can conclude that activity cost allocation is more accurate than using a single rate plant-wide. We can allocate costs more efficiently.

You might be interested in

Your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB). You agree that this stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrat

g100num [7]

Complete question:

Assume that your uncle holds just one stock, East Coast Bank (ECB), which he thinks has very little risk. You agree that the stock is relatively safe, but you want to demonstrate that his risk would be even lower if he were more diversified. You obtain the following returns data for West Coast Bank (WCB). Both banks have had less variability than most other stocks over the past 5 years.

Year ECB WCB

2004 40.00% 40.00%

2005 -10.00% 15.00%

2006 35.00% -5.00%

2007 -5.00% -10.00%

2008 15.00% 35.00%

a. What is the expected return and risk of each stock?

b. Measured by the standard deviation of returns, by how much would your uncle's risk have been reduced if he had held a portfolio consisting of 60% in ECB and the remainder in WCB? In other words, what is the difference between portfolio's standard deviation and weighted average of components' standard deviations? (Hint: check the example on page 11-12 on my note).

Solution:

The estimated return of the stock is the average profit.

So the average of ECB is (40-10+35-5+15)/5

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15% expected return

WCB expected return = 40+15-5-10+35

= $\frac{75 percent}{5}$

= 15%

They've had the same planned return.

This is generally defined in the Greek letter Mu, (U) A weighted average may also be used to calculate portfolio volatility.

Standard deviation of ECB is $\sqrt{{ sum [(x-U)^2]/5}}$

so for ECB:

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(-10-15)^2$ = $-35^2$ = 0.1225

$(35-15)^2$ = $20^2$ = 0.04

$(-5-15)^2$ = $-20^2$ = 0.04

$(15-15)^2$ =0

now 0.0625+0.1225+0.04+0.04+0=0.265

stdev= $\sqrt{(0.265/5)}$ = 0.23

So WCB is the same except in a different order to make things quick I'm only going to add the median again WCB=0.23

Then the 60/40 portfolio will be the "weighted average" of the returns.

portfolio returns

2004: (60%*40%)+(40%*40%) = 40%

2005: (60%*-10%)+(40%*15%) = 0%

2006: (60%*35%)+(40%*-5%) = 19%

2007: (60%*-5%)+(40%*-10%) = -7%

2008:(60%*15%)+(40%*35%) = 23%

we have an average return of (40+19-7+23)/5 = 75/5 =15%

The estimated return of all combined stocks is a better way to do so.

we knew they both had expected returns of 15% so we can say

(60%*15%)+(40%*15%)=15% so the portfolio has an expected return of 15%

Now we do the standard deviation for the whole portfolio and get

$(40-15)^2$ = $25^2$ =6.25%

$(0-15)^2$ = - $25^2$ =6.25%

$(19-15)^2$ = $4^2$ = 0.16%

$(-7-15)^2$ = $-22^2$ = -4.84%

$(23-15)^2$ = $8^2$ = 0.64%

now add them up and get 9.78%

$\sqrt{(9.78%/5)}$ = 13.98%

Therefore, the normal portfolio variance is 13.98 per cent and the predicted portfolio return is 15 per cent.

Every stock has a standard deviation of 23 per cent and an average return of 15 per cent, meaning that the fund has the same estimated return but with less standard deviation. This ensures that the same gain is less costly. It's stronger than any of these products.

5 0

2 years ago

Fashion, Inc. had a Retained Earnings balance of $16,000 at December 31, 2021. The company had an average income of $6,500 over

avanturin [10]

Answer:

Total amount of dividends paid over the last three years is $20500

Explanation:

The net income of the company is either retained in the company or paid out as dividends. To calculate the value of the ending retained earnings, we use the following formula,

Ending balance = Beginning balance + Net Income - Dividends

We first need to calculate the total net income for the 3 year period. The total net income for the 3 year period is, 3 * 6500 = $19500

Plugging in the available values for the ending and beginning balance of retained earnings and net income, we can calculate the value of total dividends paid for the three year period.

15000 = 16000 + 19500 - Dividends

Dividends = 35500 - 15000

Dividends = $20500

4 0

2 years ago

Robert Wilkins has prepared the following list of statements about process cost accounting. Identify each statement as true or f

Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

Identification of True or False Statements:

1. Process cost systems are used to apply costs to similar products that are mass-produced in a continuous fashion.

A. True

2. A process cost system is used when each finished unit is indistinguishable from another.

A. True

3. Companies that produce soft drinks, movies, and computer chips would all use process cost accounting.

A. True

4. In a process cost system, costs are tracked by individual jobs.select between

False

5.Job order costing and process costing track different manufacturing cost elements.

B. False

6. Both job order costing and process costing account for direct materials, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead.

A. True

7. Costs flow through the accounts in the same basic way for both job order costing and process costing.

A. True

8. In a process cost system, only one work in process account is used.

A. True

9. In a process cost system, costs are summarized in a job cost sheet.

B. False

10. In a process cost system, the unit cost is total manufacturing costs for the period divided by the equivalent units produced during the period.

A. True

Explanation:

A process costing system is a method of collecting and assigning manufacturing costs to the units produced. It is used by companies that produce similar or identical units of product in batches employing a consistent process. The unit cost is arrived at by averaging units produced to the total cost of the process.

5 0

2 years ago

Trell Corporation transferred $55,000 of accounts receivable to a local bank. The transfer was made without recourse. The local

e-lub [12.9K]

Answer:
Trell will show an amount receivable from factor equal to 20, 010 dollars.
Explanation:
NON recourse factoring is when a company sells it's invoices to a factor, without the promise that the company will buy back any uncollected invoices. The factor does not take the risk of any uncollected invoices.
So in this factoring arrangement no allowance for bad debt exist

6 0

2 years ago

Which idea best explains the Datasheet view?

nydimaria [60]

Answer:

a default setting for displaying all the data in a table

Explanation:

Datasheet View is default settings in Database Management System, which allows access to view the displayed data organized in columns and rows similar to an excel worksheet.

It also allow options for enter, delete or modify the data in a table.

Hence, in this case, the best idea that explains the Datasheet view is a default setting for displaying all the data in a table

3 0

2 years ago