answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
2 years ago
10

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

with variables x and y . What is closest to the proportion of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable?
Mathematics
1 answer:
Makovka662 [10]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}

Where:

S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}

S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}

\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}

\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}

And we can find the intercept using this:

b=\bar y -m \bar x

And the model obtained for this case is:

y = -3.4 +5.2 x

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:  

r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}  

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

You might be interested in
Isaac keeps track of the miles per gallon his car gets per week. He has accumulated the following data:
ipn [44]

we know that

A <u>geometric sequence</u> is a sequence of numbers in which the ratio between consecutive terms is constant

so

Let

a1=24 \ a2=24.48\ a3=24.97\ a4=25.47

\frac{a2}{a1} = \frac{24.48}{24}= 1.02

a2=a1*1.02

\frac{a3}{a2} = \frac{24.97}{24.48}= 1.02

a3=a2*1.02

\frac{a4}{a3} = \frac{25.47}{24.97}= 1.02

a4=a3*1.02

therefore

The common ratio is equal to 1.02

<u>the answer is</u>

The common ratio is 1.02

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The formula T = 2 pi StartRoot StartFraction L Over 32 EndFraction EndRoot relates the time, T, in seconds for a pendulum with t
Serga [27]

Answer:t

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A container contains 13 almonds, 8 walnuts, and 19 peanuts. You randomly choose one nut and eat it. Then you randomly choose ano
Fantom [35]

Answer: 8/40 and 13/40

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Elysse paid for her sandwich and drink with a $10 bill and received $0.63 in change. The sandwich cost $7.75 and sales tax was $
EleoNora [17]

Given

Elysse paid for her sandwich and drink with a $10 bill and received $0.63 in change.

The sandwich cost $7.75 and sales tax was $0.47.

Find out the  cost of her drink

To proof

Let the cost of her drink be x.

As given in the question

Elysse paid for her sandwich and drink with a $10 bill and received $0.63 in change.

Elysse paid for her sandwich and drink = 10 - 0.63              

                                                                 =  $ 9.37

sandwich cost $7.75 and sales tax was $0.47

Than the equation becomes

x = 9.37 - (7.75 + 0.47)

x = 9.37 - 8.22

x = $ 1.15

The cost of the drink is $ 1.15.

Hence proved      

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John spent $75 on a shopping trip for new clothes last week. He had expected to spend $100 on clothes. Complete the table.John's
aleksklad [387]
John’s calculations are not correct. He compared the exact value to the absolute error. The absolute error should be in the numerator and the exact value in the denominator.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Find, correct to the nearest degree, the three angles of the triangle with the vertices d(0,1,1), e( 2, 4,3) − , and f(1, 2, 1)
    10·1 answer
  • Mark has invested in Evu Confectioners. He owns 220 shares of stock in Evu Confectioners, with each share costing him $14.79 api
    11·2 answers
  • A helicopter is hovering 100 meters above the ocean. Directly below it, a submarine is at a depth of 200 meters.The altimeter on
    11·2 answers
  • Please help quickly!
    14·1 answer
  • Alexis, Becca, and Cindy do volunteer work at Adopt-a-Pet Animal Shelter. They worked a total of 285 hours at the shelter last s
    7·1 answer
  • If one lens increases the size of an image by $80\%$ and another increases the size by $50\%$ by what percent will the image be
    9·2 answers
  • Factor completely 16x8 − 1.
    13·2 answers
  • Evaluate -32 + (2-6)(10).
    10·2 answers
  • LK is tangent to circle J at point K. Circle J is shown. Line segment J K is a radius. Line segment K L is a tangent that inters
    10·2 answers
  • Consider the following sets. U = {all real number points on a number line} A = {solutions to the inequality 3x + 4 ≥ 13} B = {so
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!