answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
2 years ago
14

1. Why might local restaurants not be in the position to respond to large franchises or chains? What can local restaurants do to

avoid being ruined by chain restaurants?
Business
2 answers:
Yanka [14]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Local restaurant are not in position to respond to large chains are because of their spending budget,Brand,size they capture market,varieties of products offerings,discounts,Quality,Price.

Few are the statement which maintain long term relation with customer and can avoid ruined by big chain restaurants.

1.Use social media connection to maintain relation with locals for sustainability.

2.Blogging by various methods , use vlogging,Share every details of products to customer.

3. Implement niche marketing, target your customer, increase advertising where the customer needs most of your product.

earnstyle [38]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

PART A

(1) Low Capital base

(2) lack of proper infrastructures

(3) lack of the needed expertise and professionals

(4) lack of Competitive products.

PART B

(1) Increased Capital base

(2) invest in infrastructures needed to improve the quality of service.

(3) improved expertise and recruit professionals

(4) Local restaurants should invest in building strong and competitive brands

Explanation:Franchise is a business term used to describe the approved and licensed use of another business brand name,logo or identity to sell or do business by another business Organisation.

The following Factors are the reasons why local restaurants can not respond adequately to the challenges posed by Large franchise and chains;

(1) Local restaurants don't have the required Capital base

(2) Local restaurants don't have the needed infrastructure required to meet the Quanlity and volume of output by franchises

(3) Local restaurants lack the needed professionals and expertise.

(4) Local restaurants don't have strong and Competitive products.

Local restaurants can do the following to avoid being ruined by chain restaurants;

(1) Local restaurants should increase their Capital base.

(2) Local restaurants should invest in the needed infrastructures.

(3) Local restaurants should recruit experts with the expertise needed to improve their services.

(4) Local restaurants should invest in building strong and competitive brands.

You might be interested in
Which example best describes how a bank injects money into the economy? A bank opens a savings account for a customer. A bank ap
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

The correct answer would be option B, A bank approves mortgage for a customer.

Explanation:

Injecting money into the economy means increasing money supply in the economy. It means more money is in the circulation. So when a bank approves a mortgage for a customer, it means bank is releasing money which will be in circulation and becomes a part of the economy. Mortgage is basically the loan or money which a bank or financial institution lends to a person or company on an agreed upon interest rate in exchange of their property with the condition that the bank will sell the property to get its money back if the borrower fails to return the loaned money. So the best example of how a bank can inject money into the economy is to approve the mortgage for a customer.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Marnie earns $25,000 a year while working at a local bookstore. Because the bookstore did very well this past year, Marnie recei
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

Marnie will save = $ 125 from her raise .

Explanation:

raise income = $500

MPC = = 0.75  

Marnie consumer 0.75 of every dollar increase . So total consumption increase = 500 * 0.75 = 375 $

Marnie will save = 500 - 375 = $ 125 from her raise .

8 0
2 years ago
You are a finance intern at Chambers and Sons and they have asked you to help estimate the company's cost of common equity. You
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:

Cost of equity, re= 0.098356 or 9.84 %

Explanation:

D1 = $ 1.25

P0 = $ 27.50

gL = 5 % = 0.05

F = 6 % = 0.06

Cost of equity, re can be calculated using the formular below:

Cost of equity, re = D1/ {P0 x (1- F)} + gL

                             = $ 1.25 / {$ 27.50 x (1- 0.06)} + 0.05

                             = $ 1.25 / ($ 27.50 x 0.94) + 0.05

                             = $ 1.25 / 25.85 + 0.05

                           = 0.048356 + 0.05

Cost of equity, re= 0.098356 or 9.84 %

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following would likely result from a Malaysian quota on peanuts imported from the United States? The price of peanu
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

<em>The price of peanuts would increase in Malaysia.</em>

Explanation:

Almost all countries of the world are involved in building trade relationships because not every crop or product can be grown in a single company.

A country rich in an item tends to export the extra amounts of that particular product. In exchange, it might import other products which have a short production rate in its own countries.

<u><em> But as we all know, the prices of the imported items are often higher as compared to the local products of a country.</em></u>

Hence, in the scenario mentioned in the question, it is most likely that Malaysia will increase its prices of peanuts imported from United States.

8 0
1 year ago
Q 19.22: Portland and Hadley operate in the same industry. Portland's sales, variable costs, and fixed costs are $1,000,000, $70
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Go up or down by the same amount as Portland’s because both companies have equal net income

Explanation:

Here are the options to this question :

A: Go up twice as much as Hadley’s, but go down only half as much as Portland’s.

B: Go up or down twice as much as Portland’s.

C: Go up or down by the same amount as Portland’s because both companies have equal net income.

D: Go up or down half as much as Portland’s.

Income = Revenue - total costs

total costs = fixed costs + variable cost

For Portland

$1,000,000 - ($700,000 + $100,000) = $200,000

For Hadley :

$1,000,000 - ($400,000 + $400,000) = $200,000

If each company experiences an equal increase or decrease in sales, Hadley's income will increase and decrease as much as Portland's because both companies have equal net income

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • How were the earliest benefits of the Industrial Revolution distributed between factory owners and workers?
    10·2 answers
  • Create, Inc., a domestic corporation, owns 100% of Vinyl, Ltd., a foreign corporation and Digital, Inc., a domestic corporation.
    13·1 answer
  • Jasper Pernik is a currency speculator who enjoys "betting" on changes in the foreign currency exchange market. Currently the sp
    13·1 answer
  • Anya, sales manager for Pacific Lumber, tells Ricardo, the firm's inventory manager, that the firm's failure to have adequate su
    11·1 answer
  • Patrick purchased a used passenger automobile on June 1, 2018. He paid $19,000 for the automobile. During 2018, he uses the auto
    11·1 answer
  • Kellogg pays $2.00 in annual per share dividends to its common stockholders, and its recent stock price was $82.50. Assume that
    9·1 answer
  • You are a landlord for an office building. You just received a claim letter from a tenant asking for a refund of $2,000 for extr
    6·1 answer
  • Assuming that the standard fixed overhead rate is based on full capacity, the cost of available but unused productive capacity i
    12·1 answer
  • Casey Nelson is a divisional manager for Pigeon Company. His annual pay raises are largely determined by his division’s return o
    6·1 answer
  • Here are data on two companies. The T-bill rate is 4.8% and the market risk premium is 5.9%. Company $1 Discount Store Everythin
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!