Answer:
fixed cost = 11.026,6
Explanation:
we will use the High-Low method to sovle for variable and fixed component of utilities:
We subtract the high form the low
![\left[\begin{array}{ccc}High&2710&34712\\Low&2200&30255\\Diference&510&4457\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bccc%7DHigh%262710%2634712%5C%5CLow%262200%2630255%5C%5CDiference%26510%264457%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
510 hours generates 4,457 cost in utilities.
so variable cost:
4,457 / 210 = 8.74
Then we solve for fixed cost:
total cost = variable cost x Q + fixed cost
34,712 = 8.74(2,710) + fixed cost
fixed cost = 11.026,6
Answer:
The Net Income is $4416.1
Explanation:
The net income is calculated as follows,
Sales $46967
Less:Cost of sales <u> (17184)</u>
Gross Profit 29783
<u>Less:Expenses</u>
Selling & Admin exp (12051)
Depreciation exp (6850)
Interest exp <u> (4088) </u>
Net income before ta 6794
tax expense <u>(2377.9)</u>
Net Income <u>4416.1</u>
Answer:
19.05%
Explanation:
the approximate yield to maturity (YTM) formula is:
approximate YTM = {C + [(FV - PV) / n]} / [(FV + PV) / 2]
- C = coupon payment = $130
- FV = face value or value at maturity = $1,000
- PV = present value or current market value = $690
- n = 10 years
approximate YTM = {$130 + [($1,000 - $690) / 10]} / [($1,000 + $690) / 2] = ($130 + $31) / $845 = $161 / $845 = 0.1905 or 19.05%
Answer:
See attached photo.
Explanation:
Refer to the photo attached.
Answer:
a. I Disagree with Faith's method of handling this situation because she has not followed the internal control principle of safeguarding of assets. Stealing is a serious issue. An employee who can justify taking a box of tea bags can probably justify “borrowing” cash from the cash register.
b. I Agree with Faith's method of handling this situation because Faith has followed the internal control principle of assignment of responsibility by making one employee responsible for the cash drawer and followed the internal control principle of segregation of duties (preparing the orders) from the accounting (taking orders and payments).
c. I disagree with Faith's method of handling this situation because Faith has not followed the internal control principle of segregation of duties. It is true that faith has made one employee responsible however after cash counting another employee or Faith himself remove the cash register tape and compare the balance with cash drawer for effective internal control. Also, Faith’s standard of no mistakes may encourage the cashiers to overcharge a few customers in order to cover any possible shortages in the cash drawer.