ANSWER: (c) CONSERVATION OF NUMBER
EXPLANATION: Psychologically, Conservation refers to the ability of an individual to understand that despite the change in the appearance of an entity, the quantity remain the same.
According to Piaget's theory of cognitive development, children develops the abilities of conservation (in terms of number, area, volume, and orientation), and this stage occurs between age seven to eleven.
Thus, the experimenter is testing conservation of number, which is characterised by the ability to understand that when redistributing two entities (two identical rows), its number is still the same and not affected.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The excerpt is missing so you can answer it. The excerpt for this question is:
"Read the excerpt from "A Modest Proposal." Then as to the females, it would, I think, with humble submission, be a loss to the publick, because they soon would become breeders themselves: And besides, it is not improbable that some scrupulous people might be apt to censure such a practice, (although indeed very unjustly) as a little bordering upon cruelty, which, I confess, hath always been with me the strongest objection against any project, how well soever intended."
Answer:
Some people "might be apt to" criticize the practice.
Explanation:
Euphemism is a figure of language in the Portuguese language, a mechanism that aims to soften a word or expression that may be rude or unpleasant. The euphemism is the exchange of terms or expressions that may offend someone for softer ones, either because they are unkind or rude.
The phrase "Some people might be able to criticize the practice" is an example of euphemism, as being able to criticize "the practice" was used as a way of softening the real meaning of the practice of raising children to be devoured in the future.
I believe the answer is: Joyriding.
For most car theft, the purpose of the action is to obtain some sort of financial gain from the car.
In joyriding, the perpetrator does not interested in such financial gain and conducted the theft in order to have fun.
Answer:
(B) Led to the "one-person, one-vote" judicial doctrine - Prohibited oddly-shaped majority-minority districts
Explanation:
Baker v. Carr (1961) is a Supreme Court case concerning equality in voting districts. Decided in 1962, the ruling established the standard of "one person, one vote" and opened the door for the Court to rule on districting cases.
Shaw v. Reno (1993) In 1991, a group of white voters in North Carolina challenged the state's new congressional district map, which had two “majority-minority” districts. The group claimed that the districts were racial gerrymanders that violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In its 1993 decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that race cannot be the predominant factor in creating districts.