In the scenario depicted above of C<span>amilo taking care of the neighbors' indoor cat while they are away on vacation;</span> if I were to write the stage directions, it will be something like this, "Camilo (Worried, getting more and more agitated as he searches
the house) Peaches! Here, kitty kitty."
Answer:
Convenience sampling might not result in representative samples of the population, and this can induce errors in the results of the findings.
For example, if I want to find out about employment quality, I could go to an upscale restaurant and ask the people there about how they feel about their employment, and how much it pays. This type of convenience sample would probably result in favorable answers, with people finding job either satisfactory or high paying, or both, because those are the type of jobs that people who can afford expensive dinners tend to have. However, these findings would not be representative and would also be extremely biased.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: Theo would be considered to be a(n) ___ relativist, would be, D: Individual.
Explanation:
Relativism, especially in ethics, means that the understanding of what is right, vs what is wrong, will be relative to certain factors, be them societal, cultural, or individual. The opposite of this would be to accept that ethical values and principles are not dependent on changing, or relative to changing, factors, but are a set of standards that are universal and unmovable. However, Theo not only holds his ethical values relative to what he believes, which is that each person is responsible for developing his/her own ethical rules, but furthermore he understands that each person may judge a situation or a circumstance, under the light of such a personal set of beliefs. Thus, Theo does not believe in universal standards of ethical behavior, but on ethical principles dictated by personalized and individualized views. This is why he would be considered an individual relativist.
Answer:
Wrongful Death
Explanation:
Pretty sure this is right, I googled it a bit.
The correct answer is - The groupthink of the football team made him uncomfortable, but he felt it was more <span>important that there not be dissension before the homecoming game.
Even though the captain of the team knew it was wrong to steal the other team's mascot, he went with this idea anyway because he didn't want to create any disturbance in his own team. He knew that if he rejected their idea there might be problems and dissatisfaction in his team, and he couldn't afford that before the game.
</span>
