Answer:
The answer is the attribution dispositional and situational
Explanation:
The attributions refer to the judgments that people make on behavior, and this depends on how people perceive the situation.
<em>The attributions are divided into two:
</em>
- Dispositional Attribution
- Situational Attribution
It is known as dispositional attribution when we explain the behavior of people according to their personality characteristics, we make a judgment for the information that we know about them, obtaining an internal attribution about the behavior of the person in the situation.
For example in the case of Gamiel, he did not leave a tip for the waiter and Aliyah attributes this behavior based on the information he knows about Gamiel, who possibly only tips expensive places, Aliyah justifies the action through dispositional attribution.
The opposite of the internal attributions are the situational attributions, these justify the behavior of the people to external events that cannot be controlled but that cause an effect on the behavior of the person. For example, Gamiel and Aliyah had the experience of having a horrible service by the waiter, for which Gamiel does not leave a tip, Aliyah justifies this action to the lousy service received, here she is using situational attribution.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer: B
Explanation:
well from the information given making the store is not "profitable" so the only logical answer wold be B because they would make more money as the intrest of the building increases turning a profit even if they decided to sell the store in a year. also if the cost of making the building is lowered they are spending less to make more.
<span>Basic services such as electricity and energy, water and sanitation, refuse and waste removal are critical services to improve the lives of people. In South Africa government has committed to providing a basic amount of free water and electricity to poor people. Sanitation and waste removal will also be provided where it is possible</span>
Answer: the correct answer is (c) a fallacious argument masquerading as valid.
Explanation:
Fallacious Argument.- An argument that sometimes fools human reasoning, but is not logically valid. It is crucial to remember that reasoning from definitions and facts to conclusions is fundamentally different from reasoning about definitions.
I think it would be Equiano's capture. In my point of view, Equiano was young when he was captured by some of his tribesmen. He was hastily uprooted from his family and his land. He experienced how hard reality was. He traveled across the sea with people who treat him lowly. He grew up learning how to deal suffering and persecution from his captors.
