Answer:
Type 1 incident
Explanation:
An incident usually considered as a 'type 1' if it possess huge threats for the lives of many people and could create a huge cost for the government in terms of property damage (Example of this would be huge wild fire, hurricane , massive flood, etc)
To handle type 1 incident, Government tend to utilize a groups of federally certified teams to handle the operation. (with much more training experience compared to local team). These federally certified teams will have access to large number of national resources with all Command and General Staff positions are activated,
This may be considered an example of
"White privilege".
<span>White privilege which is also known as white skin privilege is a phrase utilized
for social and legal privileges which are at times given to those people who
are of white races as opposed to how the non white individuals are treated
under the same social or legal conditions.</span>
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
A timeshare estate involves a fee simple type of ownership.
Explanation:
Fee simple ownership is likely the most well-known form of ownership for real estate buyers. This kind of ownership can also be called fee simple absolute due to its characteristic of being fully complete. When a fee simple buyer purchases a property, he/she receives the title, which also covers the land and whatever improvements to it.
Answer:
psychosis
Explanation:
Psychoanalysis was the first psychological current that studied the psychotic, which is a patient with a mental disorder who establishes a separation between reality and himself.
Psychosis is understood as the set of mental alterations that generate an alteration in the perception of reality, losing contact with it and causing severe difficulties in the functioning of perception, thought and behavior.
