The graph is attached.
We first graph the point where his catch reached the surface, (35, 0). Since it travels upward at a constant rate, the graph will be linear. We also need to know where it starts (what depth it is at when he begins reeling it in). We can use the formula d=rt as a template for our function. d would be distance (in our case, depth), r is the rate (speed) and t is the amount of time.
To find how far the catch had to travel to reach the surface, we set up our equation as:
d = 0.1(35)
This will tell us how much distance it traveled in 35 seconds. 0.1(35)=3.5, so the catch started 3.5m under water. It then travels up at 0.1 m per second.
A. 70 × g
B. 70/g
C. 70/g2
D. 70 × g2
E. 70
answer= A
Answer:
There is no significant difference between the two averages at 5% level
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that a a college student is interested in testing whether business majors or liberal arts majors are better at trivia.
The student gives a trivia quiz to a random sample of 30 business school majors and finds the sample’s average test score is 86. He gives the same quiz to 30 randomly selected liberal arts majors and finds the sample’s average quiz score is 89
Thus he has done a hypothesis testing for comparison of two means of different subjects. n =30

Since which is better is not claimed we use two tailed test here
We find that p value
our alpha
Since p >alpha, we find that there is no significant difference between the averages of these two groups and null hypothesis is accepted
They traveled 292 miles on day two.
Known: On the first day they traveled 365 and on the second they traveled 20% less.
Solution:
If they traveled 20% less on the second day, that means they traveled 80% of the distance they traveled the first day.
365 miles * .8 = 292.
You could also solve this as:
20% of 365 is 73 miles
365 * .2 = 73.
So they traveled 73 less miles on the second day.
365 miles on the first day - 73 miles less on the second day = 292 miles.
I hope this helps!