Answer:
A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Explanation:
Assume that the premise(s) of the following argument are true. Apply the other three tests of the worthiness of an argument in their proper order: "We've lost six games in a row; our luck is probably going to change today." That argument is an example of A falacy masquerading as a valid inference
Answer:
Because Stephanie was dead.
Explanation:
It is a story about a group of friends, Sarah Koenig, Adnan Syed, Jay and Stephanie.
Stephanie was a very close friend of Adnan and she loved Jay. It was January 13th and it was Stephanie's birthday. So Adnan wanted to give a birthday present to Stephanie and also asked if Jay wanted to gift Stephanie a gift or something. Jay agreed to give a gift to her.
According to Adnan, Jay was supposed to go to the mall to buy a present and pick Adnan from the track practice at evening after school. But Stephanie was strangled and according to the police and her phone records, she was strangled in between 2:15 to 2:36 pm after the school, because people have seen her after the school going towards her car.
Answer:
D: compromise
Explanation:
What Wendy and Josh experienced is best described as a compromise because both changed their minds for a purpose and benefit of their marriage's future. A compromise is an agreement in an argument, when the parts decide to reduce their demands in order to reach a balance that is satisfactory for both.
The devil's advocacy decision-making technique is where an individual in the group is allowed to become the critic in the proposed decision
Explanation:
This decision technique helps prevent groupthink and increases the chance of a high-quality decision. It also helps prevent companies from making expensive, risky decisions.
