The answer to this question is: Valid
For example, let's say that a researcher wants to study the psychology of motivation as a variable.
In this case, motivation does not possess a measurable standard that could be used as data, so the researcher could only predict thte amount of motivation through the amount of job done (but this data is reliable because motivation is only on of the many factors that may influenced it)
<span>Perhaps the driver was taking an injured child to the hospital. If so, the fast, dangerous driving would have been caused by the situation, and therefore would not reveal anything about the driver’s personality. The observer would not necessarily form a negative impression of the driver.</span>
Answer: This is how each person will be charged:
Principal = Harold
Accomplice=Marci
Accessory before the fact = Carl
Accessory after the fact=Shawn, David
Explanation:
Principal :
Is the person who commit the actual crime , Harold is the one who went inside and cracked the safe hence he is the one who commited the actual crime.
Accomplice:
This is the person who assists someone to commit a crime , Marci drove the van to the place where Harold will commit this crime so she provided him with the transport to go and commit burglary and she is the one who helped Harold get away .
Accessory before the fact:
This is a charge given to someone who encourages ,counsels and aids someone to commit a crime eventhough this person will not be physcally there at the scene. Carl is the one who told them where the vault is located which encouraged them more to commit this crimes because they were equipped with knowledge.
accessory after the fact
This is a charge given to someone who helps a person who has committed a crime eventhough they were also not there at the scene. Shawn is told by Harold that him and merci have commited burglary but he decided to help him get away instead of reporting the crime. David saw the crime being commited but still didn't say a thing to the police.
Answer:
According to Knapp's (1938-) Model of Relational Development, Barbie and Ken are stuck at the <em>Stagnation stage.</em>
Explanation:
On the Stagnation stage <u>individuals see that their relationships are not developing anywhere and feel stuck in them</u>. As Barbie and Ken do not move past seating on the porch and talking about weather.
The other characteristic is not talking a lot. Each individual feels that he or she knows about what the other person is going to say. While stagnation stage is frustrating, people often <u>stay in it for prolonged periods of time</u> in order to avoid pain from ending the relationship altogether.
The producers can create their maximum combination of goods,
as long as the producers address the consumer desires. In this way, they may
likely be efficient with the resources they get and use in a way of creating
goods that will be useful and that it won’t go to waste.
