Answer:
A secondary reinforcer.
Explanation:
Operant conditioning can be defined as an associative learning process which involves reinforcing the strength of a behavior. Thus, the outcome depends on the response in operant conditioning.
A reinforcement of a desired behavior involves the process of strengthening a positive behavior being exhibited by an individual through the use of stimulus. Therefore, making the behavior to be exhibited in the future by the individual.
Basically, by reinforcing desired behaviors with rewards, parents, teachers and leaders can help people in building positive norms.
In this scenario, when a child behaves well for an entire day, the child earns a star. After acquiring fifteen stars, the child is allowed to pick a prize from a toy chest. The star is best described as a secondary reinforcer because it motivates or influences the decision of the child to behave well for an entire day.
A plant in the desert would have to survive days without water in order to survive
Answer:
Safe harbor peer review
It is a nursing peer review process that a nurse may initiate when asked to engage in an assignment or conduct that the nurse believes in good faith would potentially result in a violation of the Nursing Practice Act (NPA).
Explanation:
A nurse is free to invoke safe harbor at any time during their shift, including if an assignment changes along the way. To invoke safe harbor, the nurse must notify the supervisor in writing that they are invoking safe harbor.
Answer: The fundamental Attribution
Explanation:
The fundamental attribution error which is also referred to as overattribution bias which occurs when we tend to focus more on personality based descriptions and under emphasize the explanations of situations that surround them.
When people do particular things or react certain way to situations we tend to focus on the kind or type of people they are and attribute those actions to their personality trait and forget about the environment that surround them and the impact if can exert on them
Like the attribution that Carla is an anxious woman whilst not taking note of her hectic schedule that is brought by her tight deadline project which is putting pressure on her to be anxious not because she is anxious woman.
Answer:
Jefferson faces the following potential ethical dilemmas:
- By taking his clients to his property he could have been perceived as trying to influence them by buying their approval with gifts and luxuries. On the other hand, by taking them to the club he can be perceived as generous and friendly, as he is inviting them to have a good time.
- By discussing politics with the clients, he risks them associating Jefferson’s company with a specific ideology. This could harm the reputation of the company and its products, as well as alienating potential clients who do not share that view. However, by talking about politics he can be relatable to clients' view of the world.
- Since this was an informal discussion, he risked providing the clients with inaccurate information about the products, as probably he did not have accurate data at hand to back up his claims. Nevertheless, informal conversations are a good way of building rapport with clients, while providing information that suits their needs in a friendly manner.
- By meeting the clients separately in the parking lot and customizing the prices, he risks being overheard by others, who can perceive customization as a corrupt practice. He risks the clients find out that others were offered better prices. On the other hand, the clients might feel that he had a special consideration with each of them.
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma happens when there are two distinct ways to make a decision, neither is more acceptable than the other, but by choosing one the other is transgressed. This mental experiment poses questions about how to act morally, by making the best possible decision.
