Answer:
Protists kingdom, protozoa kingdom, chromista and domain eukarya are related in the different taxonomic species classification systems in phylogenetic schemes as in the organic fruit flies and humans framework kingdom classification, where Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes are categorized as superkingdom and, Protista, Metazoa (multicellular animals), Metaphyta plants and Fungi are categorized as kingdoms.
Explanation:
Several taxonomic classification systems have been proposed thoughout taxonomy development, research and evolution.
Back in 1959 Whittaker proposed a taxonomic classification system with five primary kingdoms as follows:
- Monera (Prokaryotes)
- Protista (Unicellular Eukaryotes e.g. protozoa; algae(chromista); slime molds among others)
- Fungi
- Plantae
- Animalia
But further reasearch cast a wide molecular segregation among Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes branches showing plant are closer to fungi or animals than the microsporidia from diplomonad protistans.
The Wheelis and colleagues´ system in 1992 which proposed to substitute Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya domains for Prokaryote and Eukaryote "superkingdoms" was followed by several revisions on the "kingdom" category which ranks from a 2 element classificcation: "plants" and "animals" up to 13.
The answer to this question is: A.<span>unconstitutional under the supremacy clause.
Under supremacy clause, whenever the state law and the federal law are contradicting each other, the court must follow the law that written within the federal law and rules the lesser law as unconstitutional
This clause is created to make sure that all laws in each state are up to a certain standard.</span>
Sure she is liable. She caused a fire that damaged property. Just like any other crime she can be held for restitution. Reckless endangerment, destruction of private property, destruction of public property. here in Colorado, a lady started the Hayman fire a few years back. Not only did she receive jail time but was ordered liable for $12,000,000 in damages as well for loss to property owners.
C would be the least powerful, as the speaker's uncle is not acclaimed on the subject of HIV at all.
_____________________________
PM me for more awesome answers! - Boodle
The false statement about John B. Watson is the one that says that he worked with Edward C. Tolman to prove that fear is both an instinct and a reflex.
Although he worked on the subject through the Little Albert Experiment, he did not work with Edward C. Tolman but with Rosalie Rayner, his assistant and later couple.
In the experiment, Watson intended to demonstrate how the principles of classical conditioning, which had just been raised by Ivan Pavlov in those years, could be applied to a child's fear reaction to a white rat.
