Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
Segregation of school, funds for education, job opportunities, less legal rights, lack of education, lack of access to a better future etc
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given points:
Explanation:
In point a:
As a result of the French revolution, France and Spain sacrificed territory in Great Britain. It war concluded with both the Paris Treaty, which determined the land claimed among single nations.
In point b:
Since Britain got the whole territory mostly on a map, Pontiac's revolt wanted to extend into NA territory Native, forced to keep the British out from the country as we had too much to lose, led to a dispute among Native Americans and Britain, which had been called Pontiac's revolt and over Ohio valley that was financially extremely profitable.
In point c:
The British responded through their 1763 Declaration to prevent a conflict such as Pontiac's revolt, stopping their colonists mostly on frontier west of Backwoods British forces and prevent settlers throughout the west, causing several conflicts between both the Crown or settlers.
Answer :
Demonstrate the lawmaker looking worn out and vanquished.
Explanation:
By demonstrating the politician as drained and defeated, the picture taker endeavor to pick up sympathy for the legislator to get the politician in the administration. This is extremely in the benefit of the lawmaker and in the wake of getting the official workplaces from the government segments, that specific politician pays an enormous add up to the photographer. They even keep up great association with the politician for the focal points he could give them.