Answer:
D. mixture
Explanation:
because the mixture is not part of an atom
Answer:
True to some extent...
Explanation:
We can use bio-informatical tools like MEGA to see that to what extent an amino acid sequence shares ancestry with the other one. But these tools are based on statistical methods and mathematical modelling that make them unreliable as compared to the real world observations.
So, the fact that it's a specific instrument doesn't change why you need to correct the data.
However, for this question it is important to know the instrumentation.
Since respirometers are measuring the <span>C<span>O2</span>:<span>O2</span></span><span> relation, clearly having biotic material and abiotic material will change the measurements.
You should be able to figure out that the general gas law is coming into effect because of the act of cellular respiration.
In general terms, you are correcting your instrument to a known blank (you do this with scales and every other instrument).
By determining the reading for the blank (marbles) you can know the relative error of the instrument.
Taking a scale for example: You 0 the scale to a mass of importance (the amount of error you're okay with) and then use it for your measurements so you can be adequately confident of the mass you're measuring .</span>
Answer: Plants use Carbon Dioxide to produce sugars and energy, so you could expect the high-energy sugars to be depleted as the sugars are used to produce energy, and the sugars cannot be replaced as fast as they are being used.
Answer:
The very definitions of ‘individualism’ and ‘collectivism’ are, by themselves, ideological definitions.
Reality shows us that these two ‘ideologies’ are pragmatically practiced, with one or the other being the policy-making ideology. We have already seen the results of
collectivism, as gruesomely displayed during the 75 year life of the ‘late’ Soviet Union, and the CONTINUING forms of that totalitarian collectivism in the People’s Republic of China and North Korea.
Tiananmen Square in China was the classic confrontation conflict
of the individual dissidents against the tyrannical Chinese State.
The United States, Australia, and some of the European states tend to exhibit MORE individualism by virtue of their democratic forms of government. There is NO ‘ pure individualism’ anywhere on Earth, as all national populations have their civic codes and regulations governing individual behavior.
Philosophically AND practically speaking, it is ALWAYS the individual that will be oppressed by the governing state[collectivism] - I know of NO instance -ever -where any individual person oppressed an established government.
