Answer:
it was not good
Explanation:
I mean hes out there just chopping trees and singing and killing the oxygen whilst pumping out co² with his big factory thing that churns out thneeds
Here are the answers for the three questions;
1) According to socrates, must one heed popular opinion about moral matters?
Crito realizes that Socrates blamed not justly for his crimes. In spite of this, Socrates won't attempt to get away from his destiny.
Crito's first contention to Socrates is about what individuals will think. Crito says that Socrates' companions will be blamed for being excessively frightened or excessively shabby, making it impossible to organize his escape. He at that point contends that Socrates is giving his foes what they need by accepting his destiny. Crito urges him to battle the foul play that has happened. Socrates answers that Crito ought not to worry over how he is seen by others; he should center rather on living the correct way. He reminds Crito that popular opinion isn't generally the best opinion.
2) Does Socrates accept the fairness of the laws under which he was tried and convicted?
Socrates said to Crito that one is never just in fouling up, regardless of whether it is for the correct reasons. As it were, two wrongs don't make a right. Socrates has made consent to comply with the laws of Athens and has delighted in the benefits of these laws for a long time. On the off chance that he endeavored to escape it would not just break his agreement, which would not be right, yet additionally challenge the authority of the law.
3) Would Socrates have been wrong to escape?
He trusts it is inappropriate to get away or escape. This belief depends on what we call the social contract hypothesis of government today.
Hope it helps :)
Answer:
Oklahoma Supreme Court
Explanation:
In Oklahoma, there are two courts; the court of criminal appeals makes judgement on criminal matters while Court of civil appeals makes the decision on civil matters. The Oklahoma supreme court makes the final decision on all matters.
Aimee's case is a civil issue, I she is not satisfied with Court of Civil Appeals decision, she can move the Oklahoma Supreme court for final decision.
A reason that Christian churches in Rome and Constantinople began to diverge was they could not agree on the divine nature of Christ as opposed to the human nature, with the East believing in a more "theoretical" Christ.
The answer to this question is a speech designed to persuade. A persuasive speech is a type of speech where in the speaker is inclined to convince or influence the audience or listeners to accept and believe his or her point of view / information. In persuasive speech it also has a purpose of persuading the listeners / audience to change their beliefs or opinion on a certain topic and tend to acknowledge that the speakers point of view is factual and credible. The speaker must also present himself credible to the audience in order for a persuasive speech to be effective.
