Answer: The options are given below:
A. Short term.
B. Operating.
C. Long
D. Finance.
The correct option is D. Finance.
Explanation: A finance lease is the kind of lease in which a finance company is the legal owner of the asset throughout the duration of the lease, while the lessee has both operating control over the asset, and some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset.
In a finance lease agreement, ownership of the property is transferred to the lessee at the end of the lease term.
Answer:
<em>A differentiated market</em>
Explanation:
<em>Whenever a business produces initiatives that cater to at least two product categories or targeted groups, a differentiated marketing strategy is applied</em>.
For instance, a retailer may encourage a purchase in at least two towns or locations that caters to people, or even a business can market a brand which appeals to women in at least two age categories.
Answer: Ethical Obligations and Decision-Making in Accounting-The Heading is devoted to helping students cultivate the ethical commitment needed to ensure that their work meets the highest standards of integrity, independence, and objectivity.
* This program is designed to provide instructors with the flexibility and pedagogical effectiveness, and includes numerous features designed to make both learning and teaching easier.
Explanation: The first, addressed in Part I, is the administrative cost of deregulation, which has grown substantially under the Telecommunications Act of 1996.Part II addresses the consequences of the FCC's use of a competitor-welfare standard when formulating its policies for local competition, rather than a consumer-welfare standard. I evaluate the reported features of the FCC's decision in its Triennial Review. Press releases and statements concerning that decision suggest that the FCC may have finally embraced a consumer-welfare approach to mandatory unbundling at TELRIC prices. The haphazard administrative process surrounding the FCC's decision, however, increases the likelihood of reversal on appeal.Beginning in Part III, I address at greater length the WorldCom fraud and bankruptcy. I offer an early assessment of the harm to the telecommunications industry from WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy. I explain how WorldCom's misconduct caused collateral damage to other telecommunications firms, government, workers, and the capital markets. WorldCom's false Internet traffic reports and accounting fraud encouraged overinvestment in long-distance capacity and Internet backbone capacity. Because Internet traffic data are proprietary and WorldCom dominated Internet backbone services, and because WorldCom was subject to regulatory oversight, it was reasonable for rival carriers to believe WorldCom's misrepresentation of Internet traffic growth. Event study analysis suggests that the harm to rival carriers and telecommunications equipment manufacturers from WorldCom's restatement of earnings was $7.8 billion. WorldCom's false or fraudulent statements also supplied state and federal governments with incorrect information essential to the formulation of telecommunication policy. State and federal governments, courts, and regulatory commissions would thus be justified in applying extreme skepticism to future representations made by WorldCom.Part IV explains how WorldCom's fraud and bankruptcy may have been intended to harm competition, and in the future may do so, by inducing exit (or forfeiture of market share) by the company's rivals. WorldCom repeatedly deceived investors, competitors, and regulators with false statements about its Internet traffic projections and financial performance. At a minimum, WorldCom's fraudulent or false
Answer:
Total cash= $193,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Estimated sales ($):
January= $150,000
February= $180,000
March= $220,000
40% in cash from that same month of sales
50% in cash from the previous month's sales
10% in cash from the sales from two months ago
C<u>ash collection March:</u>
From March= 220,000*0.4= 88,000
From February= 180,000*0.5= 90,000
From January= 150,000*0.1= 15,000
Total cash= $193,000
