Answer:
The warrior resolved the conflict by going ahead to attack and possibly kill the giant rat because he has to defend his honor.
Warriors have a strong sense of honor and when that honor is insulted, they tend to do everything within their power to retain that honor, even at risk of death, so because the storekeeper that insulted him turned into a giant rat shouldn't stop him from getting his honor back.
Answer:
The answer is the attribution dispositional and situational
Explanation:
The attributions refer to the judgments that people make on behavior, and this depends on how people perceive the situation.
<em>The attributions are divided into two:
</em>
- Dispositional Attribution
- Situational Attribution
It is known as dispositional attribution when we explain the behavior of people according to their personality characteristics, we make a judgment for the information that we know about them, obtaining an internal attribution about the behavior of the person in the situation.
For example in the case of Gamiel, he did not leave a tip for the waiter and Aliyah attributes this behavior based on the information he knows about Gamiel, who possibly only tips expensive places, Aliyah justifies the action through dispositional attribution.
The opposite of the internal attributions are the situational attributions, these justify the behavior of the people to external events that cannot be controlled but that cause an effect on the behavior of the person. For example, Gamiel and Aliyah had the experience of having a horrible service by the waiter, for which Gamiel does not leave a tip, Aliyah justifies this action to the lousy service received, here she is using situational attribution.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
Answer:
I would say that the best answer to the statement: The tests the trainer gave were intended to measure more than just recall of facts about the book, would be: False.
Explanation:
The example that we are shown here comes from situations that are given in a test that is known as the Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Test, and they are intended to measure the capability that a person has to reason, and think critically.
In this case, we would say that the statement is false regarding the case in question, because the trainer issues the tests not to measure either the recall, or the abilities and concepts that the students acquired from the book, but she actually wanted to see if the video format of teaching was actually more efficient than the actual book. Given that this was her intention, to measure the video vs. the book, in achieving her final goal, which was acquirement of skills and concepts on Time Management, her test must have been geared towards that end, and not to simply measure the book´s impact. It was a bonus that afterwards she found that those students who were exposed to the video later on decided to read the book. Given the information on the case itself, we can reason that the answer is false.
"Both chemical weapons and machine guns helped to create a stalemate on the Western Front" is the statement best compares the use of chemical weapons and machine guns in World War I
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In April 1915, Germany was the first use of a chemical weapon like chlorine gas, diphosgene, mustard gas at Ypres, Belgium against French. Later in 1917, French also started to use chemical weapons.
In 1925, due to overuse of chemicals weapons, The Geneva Protocol treaty prohibited the use of biological or chemical weapons in international armed conflicts.
Machine Gun also dominant during the first world war.They wiped down many enemy troops. machine guns was not a lethal weapon during Great War.
