The following that would most likely achieve your goal would be to <u>Send all the donations to the shelter that has the least.</u>
As the coordinator of a nonprofit that <em>distributes donated items</em> to three local homeless shelters, if i were to figure out a way to send donated items to three shelters that need them the most, <u>finding out the shelter that has the least</u> supplies and sending the donations to them would be the most plausible
The most likely answer would be the second option because the goal is to <em>distribute the donated items to the shelters who need it the most.</em>
<em />
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/15773457
Answer:
Dominance
Explanation:
Purple flowers are dominating character while white flowers are recessive ones. If you have a Punnet's square, you'll see the results as 3:1 where 3 is of purple flowers (2 heterozygous + 1 homozygous) and 1 is of homozygous white flowers. Thereby, seeing dominance.
if there were pink flowers, then it would be the case of co-dominance.
a dihybrid cross is only made when there are 2 characters like pod size and pod colour.
Hope this'll help:)
Answer: Testing
Explanation:
Testing because when you have done something once, you improve on it the second time because you have been exposed to it (exposed to it twice).
The answer to this question is a speech designed to persuade. A persuasive speech is a type of speech where in the speaker is inclined to convince or influence the audience or listeners to accept and believe his or her point of view / information. In persuasive speech it also has a purpose of persuading the listeners / audience to change their beliefs or opinion on a certain topic and tend to acknowledge that the speakers point of view is factual and credible. The speaker must also present himself credible to the audience in order for a persuasive speech to be effective.
Answer: The investigator are wrong to be confident in their arrest because their is no perfect match in the finger print of the person been arrested and the one gotten from the crime scene. Because their have failed to compare the finger prints pattern seen in their records, to the one gotten from the crime scene.
The investigators are wrong in their arrest because one finger that has a whorl and loop fingerprint pattern cannot produce two different finger print pattern, which was gotten from the crime scene.
Another reason why the investigator are incorrect with their arrest is because, the crime record of the man arrested is very different from the crime committed. They should have traced the people with similar crime records, that has a similar finger prints with the one gotten from the scene.
