Tell him that even though his method works, you know of a better method. Show him your approach and recommend he always use it going forward.
Explanation:
The best thing to do in this problem is to tell him that even though his method works, there is a better method.
- This better method is best presented in a subtle and practical way.
- It is best to relate the new method to the experience employee and with his experience he should be able to make logical decisions on which method to adopt.
- it is not easy to disrupt the way things are being done. it puts the whole process at risk through with productivity can suffer.
- To disrupt a process in a good way, all parties should ratify the new process and come to terms with it.
- This can be done by a little demo to show how positively the new technique can improve productivity, efficiency and other important parameters.
Learn more:
Ethics brainly.com/question/5907615
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
mindfulness; executive function
Explanation:
Mindfulness is a process of bringing one's attention to feel and experience something. It is the psychological process by which awareness and attention to a particular thing is increased.
Executive function are those functions or skills which enables us to think, plan, remain focus or pay attention to a task.
Thus when Enrique’s fourth-grade class teacher asks her students to attend to their own breathing or to manipulate an object held behind their backs while noticing how it feels, she is using mindfulness training to promote children’s executive function.
Thus the answer is mindfulness and executive function.
All depends on the store you are getting it from, ask for their size guide/chart and check
Answer:
Ultimately, few adults demonstrate reflective judgment.
Explanation:
Famous pyschologist Jean Piaget described postformal thought as more versatile, more rational, more inclined to consider moral and intellectual complexities, and more logical than previous developmental stages. Postformal thought has to do with recognizing that there are inconsistencies in the world around us. Two of its main characteristics are relativistic thinking and dialectical reasoning.
Answer:
The answer to the question: What should the investigator do when learning of the crash, would be: To report the adverse events of the broken wrist and the mild concussion.
Explanation:
This is the protocol when investigating about a crash. First comes the investigation of the adverse events, caused to the person, or persons, involved in the crash, as whatever comes from these events will have to be taken care of first. Then, after that, any other issues may be investigated. These adverse events are born from the broken wrist and the mild concussion.
