Answer:
B. $270,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the total overhead cost is shown below:
But before that first we have to find out the variable overhead per hour which is
= $90,000 ÷ 15,000
= $6 per hour
Now
Variable overhead for 25,000 hours is
= $6 per hour × 25,000
= $150,000
So,
Total overhead cost is
= Variable overhead for 25,000 hours + Fixed overhead cost
= $150,000 + $120,000
= $270,000
hence, the correct option is B. $270,000
Answer:
$3,000 understated
Explanation:
The computation of the working capital in case of no correcting entries made is shown below:
= Depreciation Expense for 2020 - depreciation expense for year 2021 - ending inventory for 2021
= $18,000 - $6,000 - $9,000
= $3,000 understated
While there is no additional errors occurred and no correcting entries passed so in this the $3,000 is understated by above calculation
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Microsoft matrix along with his rivals. There are two ways to use the technology. Microsoft and its rival can move simultaneously. The equilibrium strategy can be determined y pay off matrix. The both companies use pure strategy. The criteria for pure strategy is max-min and min-max. The max-min strategy means select least case from all the best cases and min-max is selecting the best case from all the least cases.
Non-price rationing system is commonly done by queuing (to resolve rationing problems brought by price ceilings) and by coupons (to restore buyer equilibrium). Favored customers who received special treatment from dealers when there is an excess demand, which means: owners giving goods and services to their friends, is another non-price rationing mechanism. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has helped you.
Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.