Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.
Answer:
The answer is "0.25".
Explanation:
As buyers rate non-default cars at $10,000, we assume that almost all faulty cars are used. The reason would be that the automobiles have been priced at 2000$, which is well below a good 10000 dealer invoice, implying that only faulty products are available as old cars.
Some used cars sell at $2000, however, in the eyes of a buyer means a faulty vehicle.
Its price that even a threat customer is ready to pay was its price of a non-default product for a new car. It implies $8000 for a good car* chances that even a bad car will get a good car*chance*chances that even a bad car will get a bad one. Because people are aware which x part of all market vehicles is faulty, which means the fraction of good cars is 1-x. Enter beliefs, we get.
Answer:
d. Process further, the company will be better off by $12 per unit.
Explanation:
In order to make the decision we first analyse the costs and profit per unit of each decision.
Profits from unassembled product is as,
Profit = 135 - 60 = $75 per unit
Profits from assembled product is as,
Profits = 174 - 60 - 27 = $87 per unit
The differential is a positive profit = 87 - 75 = $12/ unit after assembly.
So the company should process further as there is an additional $12 to be made per unit.
Hope that helps.
