Answer:
<em>Hamburgers = 27</em>
<em>Sodas = 93</em>
Explanation:
Let x = Hamburgers
y= Sodas
Now form a system of equation aX + bY = C
where
a= 1.75 = coefficient of variable X
b= 0.75 = coefficient of variable Y
C= 117.50
Put these values in above equation
1.75x + 0.75y = 117.50 . . . . . (1)
Since I sold total of 120 hamburgers and sodas, we can write
x + y = 120 . . . . . (2)
or y = 120 - x ....... put this value in eq.1
1.75x + 0.75( 120 - x ) = 117.50
1.75x + 90 - 0.75x = 117.50
90 + x = 117.50
x = 117.50 - 90
x = 27 .......... put this in equation 2
x + y = 120
27 + y = 120
y = 120 - 27
y = 93
Answer:
Allocated MOH= $158,000
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The standard direct labor quantity is 4 hours per lamp, and the company produced 9,800 lamps in January. This required 39,500 direct labor hours.
Allocated MOH= Estimated manufacturing overhead rate* Actual amount of allocation base
Allocated MOH= 4*39,500= $158,000
Answer:
From the given Matrix we can see that if videotech is selecting a high price, movietonia has a higher profit when it is charging a low price and this profit is 18. Similarly when videotech is selecting a lower price movietonia again has a higher profit when it is selecting a lower price which is 10. This indicates that movie tonia has a dominant strategy of selecting a low price.
If movietonia is selecting a high price videotech has a a higher pay off of 18 when it is selecting a low price. In case movietonia is selecting a low price videotech again has a higher profit when it is selecting a low price and this profi is 10.
Therefore videotech and movietonia both have dominant strategy of selecting a low price and this implies that low price, low price will be the Nash equilibrium.
In case the two firms are not colluding, both of them will choose a low price.
This is definitely an example of business dilemma game. The statement is true.
Explanation:
Answer:
Chester Company
Explanation:
Niche Cost Leader Strategy is to set the price for the products as lower than all the competitor's products and still be in profit. Thus by having set the lower prices than competitor's products in the market and achieving profit for the organization.
Chester Company is the strong competitor for the Niche Cost Leader Strategy company based on the given information, and the data as explained below.
- There is very low change in the stock market price ($0.45) and very low variation in closing stock price for the Chester Company. This indicates that the company has stable market stock price.
- Chester has lowest margins (35.8%) and lowest profits $3,144,115, as compared to other companies where as sales is high ($158,062,285), which is close to other companies of high sale value (Andrew - $211,593,184)
- Profit of Chester is lowest as compared to other companies, though sale is good. This indicates that the product price is lower than others. Thus it is strong competitor for niche cost leader Strategy Company.
- Production for the Chester Company is very high against the capacity of the company.
I know this is a bit late, but I would go with marine biology. All of the other jobs are really hands on.
