All categories

2 years ago

The chart shows a cost-benefit analysis.

Business

2 answers:

Reptile [31]2 years ago

9 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The EPA legislates and enforces more regulations that reap greater benefits than the other agencies.

Natasha_Volkova [10]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

You might be interested in

The following table shows a person's nominal and real wages for three years, as well as the price level (price index) for each y

matrenka [14]

Answer:

Year Nominal wage Real wage Price level Inflation rate

1 $7 $5 140 Nil

2 $9 $6 150 7.14 %

3 $12 $7.5 160 6.67 %

Explanation:

Note: The table for the question is attached as picture

Price level in Year 1 = (Nominal wage in year 1/Real wage in year 1) * 100

Price level in Year 1 = ($7.00 / $5.00) * 100

Price level in Year 1 = 1.4 * 100

Price level in Year 1 = 140

Real wage in Year 2 = (Nominal wage in year 2 / Price level in year 2) * 100.

Real wage in Year 2 = ($9.00 / 150.00) * 100

Real wage in Year 2 = $6

Nominal wage in Year 3 = (Real wage in Year 3 * Price level in Year 3) / 100.

Nominal wage in Year 3 = ($7.50 * 160) / 100

Nominal wage in Year 3 = $1,200 / 100

Nominal wage in Year 3 = $12

Inflation rate in Year 2 = (Price level in Year 2 - Price level in Year 1) / Price level in Year 1.

Inflation rate in Year 2 = (150 - 140) / 140

Inflation rate in Year 2 = 10 / 140

Inflation rate in Year 2 = 0.0714

Inflation rate in Year 2 = 7.14 %

Inflation rate in Year 3 = (Price level in Year 3 - Price level in Year 2) / Price level in Year 2.

Inflation rate in Year 3 = (160 - 150) / 150

Inflation rate in Year 3 = 10 / 150

Inflation rate in Year 3 = 0.0667

Inflation rate in Year 3 = 6.67%.

6 0

2 years ago

Anastasia was trying to decide which investment plan would be best over 10 years. Bank A was offering 8.5% simple interest on he

mario62 [17]

Answer: Bank B is the better investment. In 10 years, her $2,000 will grow to $4,317.85, and with bank A, her $2,000 will grow to $3,700.

Explanation:

Bank A was offering 8.5% simple interest. $2000 with 8.5% simple interest. = A = P(1 + rt)

A = 2000(1+(0.085*10))

= 2000(1+0.85)

= 2000(1.85)

= 3,700

Bank B was offering 8% compounded annually

= A = P(1+r/n)^nt

A= 2000(1+8%/1)^1*10

A= 2000(1+0.08)^10

A= 2000(1.08)^10

A= 2000*2.1589

= 4,317.85

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Turnbull Co. has a target capital structure of 45% debt, 4% preferred stock, and 51% common equity. It has a before-tax cost of

3241004551 [841]

Answer:

TurnBull's Weighted Average cost of capital is higher by 1.07% if the used common Equity to raised the capital.

Explanation:

First, using the WACC formula and using Retained earnings cost of Capital. we get the following outcome.

WACC = Debt W x after tax cost of Debt + Preferred Stock weight x Cost of capital + Equity W x Cost of Capital

WACC = 45% x 8.33% + 4% x 12.20% + 51% x 14.70% =

WACC = 3.75% + 0.49% + 7.50% = 11.73%

Second, using the WACC formula and using common equity cost of Capital. we get the following outcome.

WACC = Debt W x after tax cost of Debt + Preferred Stock weight x Cost of capital + Equity W x Cost of Capital

WACC = 45% x 8.33% + 4% x 12.20% + 51% x 16.80% =

WACC = 3.75% + 0.49% + 8.57% = 12.80%

Increase Cost using common equity over Retained earnings is (12.80% - 11.73% ) = 1.07%

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Jensen shipping has total assets of $694,800 at year's end. The beginning owners' equity was $362,400. During the year, the comp

Arisa [49]

Answer: Jensen shipping's equity multiplier at year-end is 1.80

We arrive at the answer as follows:

Sales $711,000

Profit Margin 5.2% of sales

Since Profit margin generally refers to net profit margin after tax, we don't consider the tax values in the question.

Net Profit in $ $36972 (0.052 * 711,000)$

less: Dividends -12,500

Additions to Retained Earnings 24472

Add: Beginning Owner's Equity 362400

Ending Owner's Equity 386872

The formula for Equity Multiplier is :

$Equity Multiplier = \frac{Total Assets}{Ending Shareholder's equity}$

Plugging in the values we get,

$Equity Multiplier = \frac{694800}{386872}$

$Equity Multiplier = 1.795942844
$

6 0

2 years ago

4.30 Support for casino in Toronto. In an effort

Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

a) 7% or 0.07

b) 42% or 0.42

Explanation:

Let's begin by listing out the given information:

Population = 902,

Probability distribution

Strongly support = 0.16 or 16%,

Somewhat support = 0.26 or 26%,

Mixed feelings = ?,

Somewhat oppose = 0.14 or 14%,

Strongly oppose = 0.36 or 36%

Don't know = 0.01 or 1%

a) The summation of every probability of an event (survey) is 100% ⇒ Pr (survey) = 100%

Pr (survey) = Pr [strongly support + somewhat support + mixed feelings + somewhat oppose + strongly oppose + don't know]

100 = 16 + 26 + x + 14 + 36 + 1

To obtain the probability of the 'Mixed feelings' populace, we subtract the summation of all other probabilities from 1 or 100%

x = 100 - (16 + 26 + 14 +36 + 1) = 100 - 93

x = 7% or 0.07

∴ the probability of the 'Mixed feelings' populace is 7% or 0.07

b) Probability of a random adult supporting is given by the summation of the probabilities of the adults who strongly support & those who somewhat support

Pr (support) = Pr (strongly support) + Pr (somewhat support)

Pr (support) = 0.16 + 0.26

Pr (support) = 0.42 or 42%

∴ the probability that a randomly chosen adult supports the casino in Toronto is 42%

8 0

2 years ago