Answer:
Steve Jobs coming back, Innovations, and Tim Cook taking over as COO
Explanation:
The fluctuations in stock prices of a company are due to improved performance of the company in meeting it's objectives and perception that the business will do better in the future.
In the given scenario there was an initial increase in Apple’s stock price from $27.97 to $702.10, an increase of 25 times.
This can be attributed to the return of Steve Jobs as the CEO of Apple. There was a confidence boost by his coming back. Also there were various innovations like: iPhone, iMac, iPod, and iTunes. These improved the performance and by extension share price of Apple.
However when Tim Cook took over as COO he reduced production by half resulting in stock price decrease by 37% from its peak in September 2012 until the end of March 2013, from $702.10 to $442.66.
Answer:
Value of Investment= Principal (1+Rate of return)^Number of periods
For the first investment the principal is 7,500, the rate of return is 11.5% and the number of periods are 5 so the value of the investment will be
7,500 (1+0.115)^5=12,925
For the second investment the principal is 5,000, the rate of return is 11.5 and the number of periods are 3 as the 5,000 is invested two years from today.
5,000*(1+0.115)^3=6,931
Total value of investments = 12,925 +6,931 = $19,856
<span>If gasoline taxes were significantly increased in the united states, then all of the above. I</span><span>t is likely that roads would become safer and the environment would become cleaner, other taxes, such as income taxes, could be lowered and some of the government regulations that require automakers to produce more fuel-efficient cars would become unnecessary.
If the government were to impose higher taxes on gasoline all of these outcomes could happen because they all relate to the use of gasoline and how it hurt our environment. If less people were using the gas, more eco friendly vehicle options would likely be on the market. </span>
Answer:
Kale should apply to have her license put on inactive status while she completes her CPE requirements. During thatperiod of time she may not engage in the practice of public accounting
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Kurt’s division is less risky than the other divisions.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the most likely reason is that Kurt’s division is less risky than the other divisions. Just as the saying goes "the greater the risk, the greater the reward", the same goes for the opposite, the lower the risk that a division has to undertake the lower the percent for the required return.
