Answer:
This question lacks answers. Here they are:
A) Early adopter
B) Early majority
C) Innovator
D) Late majority
E) Laggard
Answer is B) <em>Early majority </em>
Explanation:
These are the adoption categories. They measure how inclined a customer is to adopting a new product or technology. Each category describes the main aim and goal of the customer when trying the new product.
Naturally, all categories are on the gradual scale:
Innovators -> Early adopter -> Early majority -> Late Majority - > Laggard
with the <em>innovator</em> being the group that is adopting the product immediately after launch, while the <em>laggard</em> is very change-resistant, rarely making choices regarding the adoption of something new.
The thinnest line is probably the difference between <em>early adopters</em> and the <em>early majority</em>. Early adopters are not as fast as innovators when it comes to product adopting and they are often doing it because of coolness or the "wow" factor of the product. Although the time of adoption for the early majority is the same or a little bit longer than early adopters, the key difference is that the early majority puts functionality over coolness when something is new and ready for adoption.
In this example, Ariana want to receive great functionalities for the given money, so she turns to ratings, reviews and recommendations from early adopters and innovators (Eric). Eventually, when it is determined that the product proves its value, the early majority adopts it.
C. A decrease in the money supply
Nearly 700 banks failed in waning months of 1929 and more than 3,000 collapsed in 1930. Federal deposit insurance was as-yet unheard of, so when the banks failed, people lost all their money. Some people panicked, causing bank runs as people desperately withdrew their money, forcing more banks to close. By the end of the decade, more than 9,000 banks had failed. Surviving institutions, unsure of the economic situation and concerned for their own survival, became unwilling to lend money. This exacerbated the situation, leading to less and less spending.
Please find full question attached
Answer and Explanation:
Please find full answer and explanation attached
1) Road
accident officials may visit the claimant in person, to confirm the
authenticity of the claim.
<span>2) The
RAF should reinstate their existing system (the fault-based compensation
system) with a new system proposed in the high court, called the Road Accident
Fund Benefit Scheme (RABS) – a no fault benefit system – that will pardon the
affected driver from civil liability.</span>
<span>3) Certify
that there is slight intermediary intervention as possible. For instance, lessen
the amount that lawyers take as a cut from pay-out.</span>
<span>4) Utilize more efficient employees, who can make
certain that the administrative side of the RAF runs as reasonably and smoothly
as possible, with as little deceitful behavior and corruption as possible. </span>
<span> </span>
<h2>Answer:</h2><h3>To me i think that the answer is e) ad analysis </h3><h2>Explanation:</h2><h3>she was going around and survey a sample group of people. Then she suggested to her company about they develop a customizable travel application.</h3>
