Answer:
Option A is correct.
The system of equation is inconsistent is;
2x+8y=6
5x+20y=2
Explanation:
* A system of equations is called an inconsistent system, if there is no solution because the lines are parallel.
* If a system has at least one solution, it is said to be consistent .
*A dependent system of equations is when the same line is written in two different forms so that there are infinite solutions.
(A)
2x+8y=6
5x+20y=2
This is inconsistent, because as shown below in the graph of figure 1 that the lines do not intersect, so the graphs are parallel and there is no solution.
(B)
5x+4y=-14
3x+6y=6
this system of equation is Consistent because it has exactly one solution as shown below in the graph of Figure 2 and also it is independent.
(C)
x+2y=3
4x+6y=5
this system of equation is Consistent because it has exactly one solution as shown below in the graph of Figure 3.
(D)
3x-2y=2
6x-4y=4
this is a consistent system and has an infinite number of solutions, it is dependent because both equations represent the same line. as shown below in the graph of Figure-4.
Therefore, the only Option A system of equation is inconsistent.
Answer:
C. a 180° rotation about its center
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is on rotation of an object about the origin through 180°
When a point B, (h,k) is rotated about the origin 0 through 180° both clockwise and anticlockwise directions , the new position is B'(-h,-k)
Example, if we have point K (5,8) rotated through 180°, clockwise or anti-clockwise about the origin the new position will be; K'(-5,-8)
Answer:
There is 8% (P=0.08) that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have one-sample z-test with a significance level of 0.08 and a power ot the test of 0.85.
In this test, the null hypothesis will state that the new equipment has the same productivity of the older equipment. The alternative hypothesis is that there is a significative improvement from the use of new equipment.
The probability that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect is equal to the probability of making a Type I error (rejecting a true null hypothesis).
The probability of making a Type I error is defined by the level of significance, and in this test this value is α=0.08.
Then, there is 8% that Frances concludes that the new equipment increases the average daily jewelry production when in fact the new equipment has no effect.
T + b = 13...this is the seats....the number of trike seats + bike seats = 13
3t + 2b = 31....this is the wheels....number of trikes with 3 wheels + number of bikes with 2 wheels = 31 wheels
ur answer is A
