Answer:
TurnBull's Weighted Average cost of capital is higher by 1.07% if the used common Equity to raised the capital.
Explanation:
First, using the WACC formula and using Retained earnings cost of Capital. we get the following outcome.
WACC = Debt W x after tax cost of Debt + Preferred Stock weight x Cost of capital + Equity W x Cost of Capital
WACC = 45% x 8.33% + 4% x 12.20% + 51% x 14.70% =
WACC = 3.75% + 0.49% + 7.50% = 11.73%
Second, using the WACC formula and using common equity cost of Capital. we get the following outcome.
WACC = Debt W x after tax cost of Debt + Preferred Stock weight x Cost of capital + Equity W x Cost of Capital
WACC = 45% x 8.33% + 4% x 12.20% + 51% x 16.80% =
WACC = 3.75% + 0.49% + 8.57% = 12.80%
Increase Cost using common equity over Retained earnings is (12.80% - 11.73% ) = 1.07%
Answer:
The answer is: C) The scientific method may not reveal a "true" model of the world.
Explanation:
When economists and scientists use the scientific method they are trying to develop models of the world and then test them with data. Past data is used to try to predict future economic behavior. That doesn´t mean that those models are 100% accurate and true, but rather that they might (or not) apply to specific situations.
Microeconomics relies on the use of the scientific method and econometrics, while the scientific method is not applicable in macroeconomics.
Answer:
A. economic
Explanation:
Economic environment -
It consists of all the economic factors that can affect the economic market , consumers behavior , is referred to as the economic environment .
These factor are capable to alter any business .
Any changes in the monetary value , like cash , income , savings and interest rate can alter the economic environment as well .
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct option is A. economic environment .
Answer:
Mr. Crane must first draw the interests and abilities of the companions. Some of them might be logically very good and obsessive in some parts (film division, editing division, sound division, etc.) but they might be assign to some other division. This will enhance in their low level of satisfaction and motivation. This will also assist Mr. Crane in conveying the divisions as per comforts of the associate as possible.
Explanation:
Mr. Crane must achieve an unidentified Response Survey between staffs so that their disquiets and problems can be carried out. Some individuals might not give this response openly.
Mr. Crane must also look at some of the work structures which are very serious for employee’s job satisfaction:
- Operational time (Are Associates working long hours?)
- Pay and compensation (Are they paid less than market rates?)
- Training and learning opportunities
- Traditional and sport actions to keep staffs involved
- Inspiration from leaders
Mr. Crane must find out the points through above methods and effort to discourse them so that staffs feel pleased and motivated. He can also initiate Rewards & Recognition program to escalate good workers. This will also improve their motivation.
Answer:
(1) increasing funding to its existing R&D department to expand to the development of AI (artificial intelligence) technology, needed for self-driving vehicles
This strategy would produce the benefit of puttinig the company on the edge of the development of AI in order to produce driverless vehicles.
The risk is that the investment could be too high for the initial benefit, since there is no certainty that driveless cars will be in the market in the short-term.
(2) launching a fully owned subsidiary (a new company that it owns and controls) focused exclusively on AI
This strategy would produce a similar benefit as the strategy above. However, it could also benefit from a little bit less administrative control because in this case, the AI development would be in charge of a subsidiary, not a division.
The risk is the same as above: initial investments may be too high for the initial benefits.
(3) partnering with a major Silicon Valley tech company that has already made considerable progress on AI technology.
This strategy produces the benefit of requiring less investment while still putting the company on the edge of AI research. However, the risk lies in loss of control over the thecnology, and possible future conflicts with the partner company.
