"To whom do individuals and groups report?" was the key questions addressed by this element.
<u>Explanation:</u>
An unbroken line of authority stretching from the top of the company to the lowest echelon and declare with transparency about who is accountable to whom known as "Chain of command".
From the bottom to the top of an organization it showcase company's hierarchy of reporting relationships. It also construct accountability and lays out lines of authority and decision-making power of authority or company.
The organizational structure is comprised of six fundamental elements named as: chain of command, centralization or decentralization, departmentalization, specialization of the work, span of control and the degree of formalization.
Answer: Deliberative
Explanation: Arguments which are embarked upon by members of a group usually in other to explain the different sides of a particular topic. In other words, deliberative arguments usually involves members of a group which work collectively to show people the pros and cons of a certain topic or subject before finally arriving at a certain general conclusion or consensus. In deliberative arguments, the objective or goal of the topic is already known by the collaborating proposed, but in other to resolve underlying unambiguities, participants first come up with different and incompatible views before finally reaching a consensus.
I believe the correct answer is inhibited temperament in childhood.
Jerome Kagan worked on his theory about childhood temperament which may affect adults greatly, and he came up with two types of temperament: inhibited and uninhibited. Inhibited temperament occurs with shy and fearful children, whereas uninhibited has to do with kids who are sociable and outgoing.
<span>An example of an externalizing problem is <u>Attacking other people</u>, while an example of an internalizing problem is <u>being withdraw</u>n.</span>
