Answer: Hindsight bias
Explanation:
Hindsight bias is the bias in which people tend to over-emphasize their ability of prediction about any situations outcome that could not have easily been predicted. They tend to show that they knew about the outcome all along
According to the question ,hindsight bias is shown through case where friends were unsure that marriage of Loonie and Burt would last and when they actually got divorced, friends were overestimating their skill that this outcome prediction from the beginning.
Answer:
The School Board says Libby and her friends released an unauthorized publication on school grounds. Their defense should be "the whole program (including content, publication, and location) was discussed with and approved by her teacher (her primary interface with the school hierarchy)" If there is any fault to be found, it falls on a) the Teacher's head since she didn't advise Libby to seek permission from any other members in the hierarchy, and/or b) the hierarchy itself for not conveying the need to seek permission for thios type of program. I'm sure other "publications" (artwork, themes, book reports, biographies, and so on) can be shown to set precedent for publications on school grounds without formal permissions.
Re First Ammendment Rights: The description of documents in the ammendment clearly parallels the content of the newspaper. Per referenced source": Criticism of the government and advocacy of unpopular ideas that people may find distasteful or against public policy are almost always permitted. Within these limited areas, other limitations on free speech balance rights to free speech and other rights, such as rights for authors and inventors over their works and discoveries (copyright and patent), protection from imminent or potential violence against particular persons (restrictions on fighting words), or the use of untruths to harm others (slander). Distinctions are often made between speech and other acts which may have symbolic significance.
Despite the exceptions, the legal protections of the First Amendment are some of the broadest of any industrialized nation, and remain a critical, and occasionally controversial, component of American jurisprudence.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Respect for person
Explanation:
According to my research on different ethical violations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the ethical principal being violated would be a respect for people. This is because the as a subject for a research they deserve to know what they are getting into and what they should expect in terms of risks and benefits, because it might interfere with their safety.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Based on this situation, if Tony is charged with the crime,
the element of his defense that might be at issue are the following;
<span>·
</span>Nature of threat – this is defined as a
non-manmade incident that is caused by a process of a natural environment or
caused by biological, geological or meteorological conditions.
<span>·
</span>Level of belief regarding the threat – this is
the belief of an individual in regards to a certain threat that he or she may
be associated to.
<span>·
</span>Immediacy of the threat – this is referred to as
a way of an individual’s response to a certain threat.
Answer:
ठीक छ, मलाई लाग्छ कि त्यहाँ छ
Explanation: