All categories

2 years ago

H is directly proportional to the square root of p h= 5.4 when p = 1.44 find h when p =2.89

Mathematics

1 answer:

LenKa [72]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

h=7.65

Step-by-step explanation:

H is directly proportional to the square root of p;

Let k be the constant of proportionality;

Means h=k√p

This means for corresponding points of h and p such that (h1,p1) and (h2,p2) we have;

h1/√p1=h2/√p2

Let h= 5.4 when p = 1.44 and h when p =2.89 be respectively (h1,p1) and (h2,p2)

So that

5.4/√1.44=h/√2.89

5.4/√1.44 ×√2.89 = h

7.65= h

h=7.65

You might be interested in

I need help please help me

Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

which one do you need help on

6 0

2 years ago

Find the area of the part of the plane 5x + 4y + z = 20 that lies in the first octant.

BlackZzzverrR [31]

This part of the plane is a triangle. Call it $\mathcal S$ . We can find the intercepts by setting two variables to 0 simultaneously; we'd find, for instance, that $y=z=0$ means $5x=20\implies x=4$ , so that (4, 0, 0) is one vertex of the triangle. Similarly, we'd find that (0, 5, 0) and (0, 0, 20) are the other two vertices.

Next, we can parameterize the surface by

$\mathbf s(u,v)=\langle4(1-u)(1-v),5u(1-v),20v\rangle$

so that the surface element is

$\mathrm dS=\|\mathbf s_u\times\mathbf s_v\|=20\sqrt{42}(1-v)\,\mathrm du\,\mathrm dv$

Then the area of $\mathcal S$ is given by the surface integral

$\displaystyle\iint_{\mathcal S}\mathrm dS=20\sqrt{42}\int_{u=0}^{u=1}\int_{v=0}^{v=1}(1-v)\,\mathrm dv\,\mathrm du$
$\displaystyle=20\sqrt{42}\int_{v=0}^{v=1}(1-v)\,\mathrm dv=10\sqrt{42}\approx64.8074$

3 0

2 years ago

In studying the insurance preferences of homeowners the following conclusions are made: A homeowner is three times as likely to

Ede4ka [16]

Answer:

0.632

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that a homeowner is three times as likely to purchase additional jewelry coverage as additional electronics coverage

If probability of purchasing additional electronics coverage = p, then prob of purchasing jewelry coverage = 3p

The two events are independent hence joint probability is product of these two.

i.e. P(both) = $p(3p) =3p^2$

This is given as 0.2

$3p^2 =0.2\\p = 0.258$

the probability that a homeowner purchases exactly one coverage.

$=P(AUB)-P(A \bigcap B)$

= Prob he purchases I + prob he purchases II-2(prob he purchases both)

$= 0.258+3(0.258)-2(0.2)\\=0.632$

5 0

2 years ago

Leonora is factoring a trinomial. The factors of the trinomial are shown on the model. An algebra tile configuration. 7 tiles ar

Keith_Richards [23]

Leanora is factoring in Amacher the factors of the thermometer are shown in the elevator 3+3 = 7 4+4 equalsTake away 100 and then +3 that gives you 6 billion in 2/3+6+4+3+8+9 that gives you a BCDEFGHIJK jelly jelly jelly diaper

6 0

2 years ago

Customers are used to evaluate a preliminary product design. In the past, 95% of highly successful products received good review

Sever21 [200]

Answer:

a. 61.5%; b. About 61.8%; c. About 36.4%

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a kind of question that we can solve using the Bayes' Theorem. We have here all the different conditional probabilities we need to solve this problem.

According to that theorem, the probability of a selected product attains a good review is:

$\\ P(G) = P(G|H)*P(H) + P(G|M)*P(M) + P(G|P)*P(P)$ (1)

In words, the probability that a selected product attains a <em>good review</em> is an <em>event </em>that depends upon the sum of the conditional probabilities that the product comes from <em>high successful product</em> P(G|H) by the probability that this product is a <em>highly successful product</em> P(H), plus the same about the rest of the probabilities, that is, P(G|M)*P(M) or the probability that the product has a good review coming from a <em>moderately successful</em> product by the probability of being moderately successful, and a good review coming from a poor successful product by the probability of being poor successful or P(G|P)*P(P).

<h3>The probability that a randomly selected product attains a good review</h3>

In this way, the probability that a randomly selected product attains a good review is the result of the formula (1). Where (from the question):

P(G|H) = 95% or 0.95 (probability of receiving a good review being a highly successful product)

P(G|M) = 60% or 0.60 (probability of receiving a good review being a moderately successful product)

P(G|P) = 10% or 0.10 (probability of receiving a good review being a poorly successful product)

P(H) = 40% or 0.40 (probability of being a highly successful product).

P(M) = 35% or 0.35 (probability of being a moderately successful product).

P(P) = 25% or 0.25 (probability of being a poor successful product).

Then,

$\\ P(G) = P(G|H)*P(H) + P(G|M)*P(M) + P(G|P)*P(P)$

$\\ P(G) = 0.95*0.40 + 0.60*0.35 + 0.10*0.25$

$\\ P(G) = 0.615\;or\; 61.5\%$

That is, <em>the probability that a randomly selected product attains a good review</em> is 61.5%.

<h3>The probability that a new product attains a good review is a highly successful product</h3>

We are looking here for P(H|G). We can express this probability mathematically as follows (another conditional probability):

$\\ P(H|G) = \frac{P(G|H)*P(H)}{P(G)}$

We can notice that the probability represents a fraction from the probability P(G) already calculated. Then,

$\\ P(H|G) = \frac{0.95*0.40}{0.615}$

$\\ P(H|G) =\frac{0.38}{0.615}$

$\\ P(H|G) =0.618$

Then, the probability of a product that attains a good review is indeed a highly successful product is about 0.618 or 61.8%.

<h3>The probability that a product that <em>does not attain </em>a good review is a moderately successful product</h3>

The probability that a product does not attain a good review is given by a similar formula than (1). However, this probability is the complement of P(G). Mathematically:

$\\ P(NG) = P(NG|H)*P(H) + P(NG|M)*P(M) + P(NG|P)*P(P)$

P(NG|H) = 1 - P(G|H) = 1 - 0.95 = 0.05

P(NG|M) = 1 - P(G|M) = 1 - 0.60 = 0.40

P(NG|P) = 1 - P(G|M) = 1 - 0.10 = 0.90

$\\ P(NG) = 0.05*0.40 + 0.40*0.35 + 0.90*0.25$

$\\ P(NG) = 0.385\;or\; 38.5\%$

Which is equal to

P(NG) = 1 - P(G) = 1 - 0.615 = 0.385

Well, having all this information at hand:

$\\ P(M|NG) = \frac{P(NG|M)*P(M)}{P(NG)}$

$\\ P(M|NG) = \frac{0.40*0.35}{0.385}$

$\\ P(M|NG) = \frac{0.14}{0.385}$

$\\ P(M|NG) = 0.363636... \approx 0.364$

Then, the <em>probability that a new product does not attain a good review and it is a moderately successful product is about </em>0.364 or 36.4%.

8 0

2 years ago