This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
Read the counterclaim to the claim that funding for the space program is important.
While the idea of exploring space is indeed inspiring, critics argue that it's not financially responsible. They say there are more important things to focus on here on Earth, such as helping people to find jobs and improving their quality of life.
Now read the rebuttal.
With all the problems facing people today, it is understandable that some critics might think that exploring space is foolish and wasteful. But the space industry creates jobs and stimulates the economy.
Luca wants to add one more sentence to the end of the rebuttal so he can fully address the counterclaim. Which would be the best addition to rebuttal?
In addition, thinking about space exploration makes people feel hopeful and inspired.
But, some lawmakers are challenging the space agency’s request for a $17.7 billion budget.
In addition, nine of the twenty-five top scientific breakthroughs in the last twenty-five years came from space exploration.
Therefore, it is up to the space industry to make its critics understand how useful space exploration is.
Answer: In addition, nine of the twenty-five top scientific breakthroughs in the last twenty-five years came from space exploration.
Explanation:
The counterclaim focuses on the financial side of funding space programs. Luca has already established the financial benefits of the space industry generating employment for those who need it, therefore stimulating the economy.
A sentence focused on the inspirational side of space exploration would not address the main point of the counterclaim, nor it would be adding data about the amount of the budget or leaving it to the space industry to solve the issue.
Adding information about further economical benefits, such as the scientific breakthroughs that were achieved thanks to space exploration, would be the best sentence to end the rebuttal.
