answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aniked [119]
2 years ago
5

Consider two nations, Spendia and Savia. The MPC for Spendia is 0.8, and the MPC for Savia is 0.5. Assume that both nations expe

rience an increase in gross investment (I) of $100 million at their existing GDP levels.
a. Considering the multiplier effect, what will be the overall increase in income (Y) for each nation?
b. Now assume that a third nation experiences an increase of $250 million in its income and its gross investment (I) increases by the same amount as Spendia and Savia, which is $100 million.

The expenditures multiplier of this third nation is ________ suggesting an MPC of _________.
Business
1 answer:
alexandr1967 [171]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

a. Overall increase in income (Y) for Spendia is $500 million, while overall increase in income (Y) for Savia is $200 million

b. The expenditures multiplier of this third nation is <u>2.50</u> suggesting an MPC of <u>0.6</u>.

Explanation:

a. Considering the multiplier effect, what will be the overall increase in income (Y) for each nation?

<u>For Spendia</u>

MPC = Marginal propensity to consume = 0.8

MPS = Marginal propensity to save = 1 - 0.8 = 0.2

Multiplier = 1 / MPS = 1 / 0.2 = 5

Overall increase in income (Y) for Spendia = Increase in gross investment * Multiplier = $100 million * 5 = $500 million

<u>For Savia</u>

MPC = 0.5

MPS = 1 - 0.5 = 0.5

Multiplier = 1 / MPS = 1 / 0.5 = 2

Overall increase in income (Y) for Savia = Increase in gross investment * Multiplier = $100 million * 2 = $200 million

b. Now assume that a third nation experiences an increase of $250 million in its income and its gross investment (I) increases by the same amount as Spendia and Savia, which is $100 million.

Note that generally in macroeconomics, savings (S) is equal to gross investment (I). Consequently, it is assumed that an increase in gross investment (I) eqauls to an increase in savings (S).

Based on this, we have:

Increase in income (Y) = $250 million

Increase in gross investment (I) = Increase in savings (S) = $100 million

MPS = Increase in savings / Increase in income = $100 / $250 = 0.40

Multiplies = 1 / MPS = 1 / 0.4 = 2.5

MPC = 1 - MPS = 1 - 0.4 = 0.6

Therefore, the expenditures multiplier of this third nation is <u>2.50</u> suggesting an MPC of <u>0.6</u>.

You might be interested in
Lin Co., a distributor of machinery, bought a machine from the manufacturer in November for $10,000. On December 30, Lin sold th
Arisa [49]

Answer:

B. $0

Explanation:

he transaction between Lin and Zee appears to be a conditional sale. The reason being that zee hardware has the right to return the machine if unable to resell it. According to their agreement, should Zee hardware return the machine, its obligation to Lin will be zero.

As per Lin's assessment, and based on their previous transactions,  the probability of Zee returning the machine is very high. Lin is sure that Zee hardware will not sell the machine. For this reason, Lin should not record the transactions as a sale.

3 0
2 years ago
Sixteen-year-old Travis Mitchell brought his Pontiac GTO into M&amp;M Precision Body and Paint for body work and a paint job. M&
sergiy2304 [10]

Answer:

Since Travis is a minor, he is able to disaffirm a contract. Minors are not allowed to sign contracts except those that include basic necessities like food or shelter. This is not the case here since painting a car is not considered a basic necessity. As long as Travis disaffirms the contract while being a minor, the other party cannot do anything about it. This applies even if Travis cannot make any type of restitution since he cannot return the paint job.

5 0
2 years ago
The Nelson Company has $1,750,000 in current assets and $700,000 in current liabilities. Its initial inventory level is $490,000
aleksley [76]

Answer:

(a) Short-term debt can increase by a maximum of $466,666.67 without pushing its current ratio below 1.9

(b) The firm's quick ratio after Nelson has raised the maximum amount of short-term funds is 1.34

Explanation:

Current assets = $1,750,000

Current liabilities = $700,000

Initial inventory level = $490,000

Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities

= $1,750,000 ÷ $700,000 = 2.5

1.9 = (Current assets + \Delta{NP) ÷ (Current liabilities + \Delta{NP)

1.9 = ($1,750,000 + \Delta{NP) ÷ ($700,000 + \Delta{NP)

1.9 × ($700,000 + \Delta{NP) = ($1,750,000 + \Delta{NP)

$1,330,000 + 1.9\Delta{NP = $1,750,000 + \Delta{NP

0.9\Delta{NP =  $1,750,000 - $1,330,000

\Delta{NP = $466,666.67

Short-term debt can increase by a maximum of $466,666.67 without pushing its current ratio below 1.9

Quick ratio = (Current assets - Inventories) ÷ Current liabilities

= $937,500 ÷ $700,000

= 1.34

5 0
2 years ago
Journalize the following five transactions for Nexium &amp; Associates, Inc. Omit explanations.
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

Nexium & Associates Journal entries

March 1

Dr Accounts Receivable800

Cr Service Revenue 800

March 9

Dr Office Furniture1,060

Cr Office Supplies 160

Cr Accounts Payable1,220

March 15

Dr Accounts Payable1,220

Cr Cash1,220

March 23

Dr Electricity Expense430

Cr Accounts Payable430

March 31

Dr Salaries Expense850

Cr Cash850

Explanation:

The details given about Nexium & Associates are straight forward and required no further

adjustment.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Baldwin Company has just purchased $40,900,000 of plant and equipment that has an estimated useful life of 15 years. The exp
Svet_ta [14]

Answer:

b. $4,908,000

Explanation:

According to the FASB GAAP, the straight line method is used in this given question which is shown below:

= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)

= ($40,900,000 - $4,090,000) ÷ (15 years)

= ($36,810,000) ÷ (15 years)  

= $2,454,000

In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life

For two years, the accumulated depreciation would be

= Annual year depreciation × number of years

= $2,454,000 × 2 years

= $4,908,000

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Pappy's Toys makes two models of a metal toy—Standard and DeLuxe. Both models are produced on a single machine. The price and co
    5·1 answer
  • Shawn went to a restaurant where the beer was mediocre and the place was run-down. The restaurant was out of many of its more po
    15·1 answer
  • Matthew currently has $2,000 in his checking account and $10,000 in a savings account. He owns a home worth $120,000 and he owes
    10·1 answer
  • In spring 2014, Parmac Engineering Company signed a $160 million contract with the city of Parkersburg, to construct a new city
    15·1 answer
  • Carol Mann and Gerald Harris worked for Helmsley-Spear, Inc. (HSI), as managers for various HSI properties. In 2005 each receive
    14·1 answer
  • The nation of Pineland forbids international trade. In Pineland, you can buy 1 pound of fish for 2 pounds of pineapples. In othe
    13·1 answer
  • Mesa Telcom has three divisions, commercial, retail, and consumer, that share the common costs of the company's computer server
    6·1 answer
  • Where should charts with Food Code 3-401 be displayed?
    15·2 answers
  • Amy owns a salon and spa. She’s leasing a prime piece of real estate in which she’s installing salon chairs, counters, massage t
    9·1 answer
  • If I currently sell 10,000 units, and my use of Formula 1 indicates that I will need to sell 500 additional units to justify my
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!