Answer: According to Tetlock argument, Expert with good predictive power should be willing to;
• EXPLORE DIVERSE INFORMATION AND ANALYTICAL MODEL
• CHALLENGE CONVENTIONAL WISDOM
• BE COMFORTABLE WITH COMPLEXITY AND UNCERTAINTY.
Therefore option b,c,e is the right answer.
Explanation: The predictive power of a scientist is the power a scientist has to generate a testable prediction, thereby making its theory to be a testable prediction.
For an expert to have good predictive power it must have the ability to explore diverse information and analytical model, because when you explore different information and analyse it in the best form, you will be able to postulate more information and discoveries, which can help you to predict a testable theory. By exploring you are trying to challenge conventional wisdom, of why should this be this?, You may get confused and uncertain at a point. But if he you have a good predictive power, you can be able to absorb it all to achieve your discovery and produce a scientific theory with a predictive power.
I think the second one and fouth one are correct but I could be totally wrong :/
Answer:
Personality psychology
Explanation:
Personality psychology is used to test for individual differences such as behavior patterns,social attitudes,traits etc; it shows personality and its variation among individuals which shows that there is self-concept in all being. Gordon Allpor is considered as the father of Personality psychology.
This branch of psychology helps researchers compare the traits of their subjects to psychological force.Therefore,Personality psychology is the specialty area that best represent Dr. Roberts validation of tests to assess individual differences in traits.
Answer:
a. computational tools
c. specific observations
Explanation:
Economists and engineers are professionals who work with an imminent risk that their projects will go wrong. The problem with these professionals is that any mistake can cause huge losses and even millionaires, so these professionals need to rely on certain elements to estimate a possible risk and resolve that risk before it causes a design error and causes huge damage to the project. professional.
The elements that economists and engineers use to estimate a possible risk must be rational elements based on concrete things and calculations that enable the simulation of an accurate result. Among the options given in the question, the elements that best fit this concept are computational tools and specific observations.
The correct term used is Job Shadowing, or, Shadowing Program. This training program is literally designed as a way for an inexperienced new worker, who wishes to learn the ropes of a job fast, to do so and with the least use of resources from the company. In fact, many companies use this method of training because it helps them to achieve their main goals with a new trainee. First, it saves on training costs, as the new person will be under the supervision and care of a more experienced worker. And second, it allows the trainee to get first-hand, train on the field experience under the guidance of someone who is already being paid, so this means less costs in recruiting trainers for companies.
