<h3>
Answer:</h3>
42. 29°
43. 3x³ +2x² -3x +10
44. 20a² +68a
<h3>
Step-by-step explanation:</h3>
42. The right-angle corner tells you the two marked angles are complementary — they sum to 90°.
(-3x +20)° + (-2x +55)° = 90°
-5x +75 = 90 . . . . . . . . . . collect terms, divide by °
-5x = 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . subtract 75
x = -3 . . . . . divide by the coefficient of x
The angle of interest is (-3x+20)°. Filling in the found value for x, we have ...
(-3·(-3) +20)° = 29° = m∠BDC
___
43. The distributive property is useful for multiplying polynomials.
(x +2)(3x² -4x +5) = x(3x² -4x +5) +2(3x² -4x +5)
= 3x³ -4x² +5x +6x² -8x +10 . . . . . eliminate parentheses
= 3x³ +2x² -3x +10
___
44. Area is the product of length and width, so this becomes a problem in multiplying polynomials.
area = (5a +17)(4a) = 20a² +68a . . . . area in square feet
Answer: The frog fell asleep for 4 nights.
Step-by-step explanation: First, he climbs up 3m every night. there are 16 nights before he gets to 29m. He has not climbed up for the 16th day so 15*3= 45. 45-29= 16. 16/4=4. The frog slept for 4 nights.
So,
1. Type I profits $20
2. Type II profits $30
3. Type III profits $40
4. I/day < 100
5. Type I needs 5 hrs.
6. Type II needs 10 hrs.
7. Type III needs 15 hrs.
8. Total hrs. available: 2000 hrs.
Every +5 hrs. spent yields an extra $10.
If we use 500 hrs. to make 100 Type I stereos, we will profit $2000.
If we use 500 hrs. to make 50 Type II stereos, we will profit $1500.
If we use 495 hrs. to make 33 Type III stereos, we will profit $1320.
We should use the first 500 hrs. to make Type I stereos.
We should use the last 1500 hrs. to make Type II stereos.
$2000 + $4500 = x
$6500 = x
There must be 100 Type I stereos made along with 150 Type II stereos made.
Answer:Transform the equation to isolate x: ax = bx + 1. How is the value of x related to the difference of a and b
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is
No. As the 95% CI include both negative and positive values, no proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference between them.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have to construct a confidence interval for the difference of proportions.
The difference in the sample proportions is:
The estimated standard error is:
The z-value for a 95% confidence interval is z=1.96.
Then, the lower and upper bounds are:
The confidence interval for the difference in proportions is
<em>Can it be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group?</em>
No. It can not be concluded that there is a difference in the proportion of drivers who wear a seat belt at all times based on age group, as the confidence interval include both positive and negative values.
This means that we are not confident that the actual difference of proportions is positive or negative. No proportion is significantly different from the other to conclude there is a difference.
