He has to have negative marginal returns. I hope this helps :)
Answer: $1,000
Explanation:
Given Data;
Total government demand is Q = 800 -10P
marginal cost (Mc) = $50
contracted price (cp) = $70 per unit
Therefore;
Marginal Revenue ( MR ) = Marginal Cost ( MC)
Q = 800 -10P
800 - Q = 10P
Divide through by 10, where Q = 1
800/10 - 1/10 = P
80 - 0.1Q = P
Total Revenue(TR) = PQ
TR = 80 - 0.1Q
MR = MC
where MC = $50
80 - 0.1Q = 50
Collecting like terms
80 - 50 = 0.1Q
30 = 0.1 Q
Divide both side by 0.1
Q = 300
Price would be
P = 80 - 0.1Q
P = 80 - 0.1(300)
P = $50
MC = 40
Producing Q units
Total Cost (TC ) = 40 * ( 300 )
= $12,000
Total profit
= TR - TC
= ( P * Q ) - $12,000
= ( $50 * 300 ) - $12,000
= $15,000 - $12,000
= $3,000
Changes caused by regulations
Contracted price = $70
Quantity = 100Units
TT’ = ( P * Q ) - TC
= ( 70 * 100 ) - ( 50 * 100 )
= $7,000 - $5,000
= $2,000
TT - TT’ = $ ( 3000 - 2000 )
= $1,000
If legislation is passed all profit would reduce by $1,000
Answer:
the rate of return on Karen investment is 10%
Explanation:
Given that
Bought price = P = $78500
Sale price = S =$850,000
Time priod = n = 25 years (1980 to 2005)
Based on the above information
The Rate of return is
= (S ÷ P)^(1 ÷ n) - 1
= ($850,000 ÷ $78,500)^(1 ÷ 25) - 1
= 0.099973
= 10.00%
hence, the rate of return on Karen investment is 10%
We simply applied the above formula
Answer:
A) cognitive
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that three persons are working for DavidSon international. All three have in their positions in the company but Willy received a small raise after considering the evaluation of last performance
In case when Thad complained regarding the raise so he was experiencing a cognitive attitude that deals in belief, knowledge, thoughts of a particular person
hence, the correct option is A.