Answer:
$61,175
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question, we expected to solve for the future worth
The table of the cash flow is shows in the picture
We can find that by calculating the Future worth
Future Worth = {2,500 + 1,500(P/A 7%,10) 100 + (P/G 7%,10) } [F/P 7%, 20]
Future worth = { 2,500 + 1500(7.024) + 100(27.716)}
Future worth = $61,175
Answer: The correct answers are "A. Accept" and "$ 0.01".
Explanation: Given that we talk about optimal strategy when maximizing the expected profit by the player:
In the first case It is convenient to accept the proposal and keep $ 0.12, instead of rejecting it and running out of nothing.
And in the second case it is convenient to give the classmate as little as possible so that he accepts and we have a greater profit.
Answer:
The correct answer is A) top quality.
Explanation:
There are generally two sales approaches: the first, product-oriented. This takes into account its own characteristics in terms of presentation, quality and utility; and the second, people-oriented, where the real needs of the consumer are studied to determine how he uses the good in order to orient himself towards satisfying a need.
The example clearly shows that the orientation with minimum unit costs was mainly focused on the client, so that the first impression is that of a lower price to motivate their purchase decision. For his part, Orchard clearly shows a product orientation, because he tries to offer quality by sacrificing other variables to supply a need.
Answer:
Retiring the oldest bond
Explanation:
Firms issue bonds to raise the funds. Firm has to pay dividend on those bonds and the ability of firm to pay dividend reflect the financial position of the firm. Thus, retiring the oldest bond in exposes company to the most risk of being issued an emergency loan
