Answer:
If you use the money reasonably and wisely, Yes, I think you can live 30 days with 1000 dollars in savings.
Answer:
Reactively, Proactively.
Explanation:
The above statement deals computing forces companies dealings with customers. Generally, in real-life dealings, we cannot afford to have a choice between Proactive and Reactive approaches. Proactive approach is generally more effective in terms of avoiding /reducing loss of life and property etc. however, it depends on the situation, time available to take action and resource availability. I have seen that even in the case of worst natural disasters like cyclones , proactive approach by civic authorities ,on the basis of limited scientific forecast inputs available, helped in averting major damages.
However, if there is a sudden accident, we have no other choice but to react on the spot. In some situations, like disasters ( man-made or natural) , a combination of proactive and reactive approaches can be more effective.
Answer:
a) 749
b) 4.073
Explanation:
Given:
Mean = demand = 80 pounds
Standard deviation of demand = 10 pounds
Lead time = 8 days
Standard deviation of lead time = 1 day
a) What ROP would provide a stock out risk of 10 percent during lead time.
To find this re-order point (ROP) quantity, take the formula:
Here, service level = 100%-10% = 90%,
Thus z at 90% = ±1.28
= 640 + 1.28* 84.85
= 748.61
≈ 749 units
b) What is the expected number of units (pounds) short per cycle.
Find the number of units shorts per cycle. Take the formula:
[
Where E(z) = standardized number of shorts = 0.048
= standard deviation of lead time demand = 84.85
Therefore,
E(n) = 0.048 * 84.85
= 4.073
Answer:This violates no federal law
Explanation:
Federal laws are bills that have passed both houses of Congress, been signed by the president, passed over the president's veto, or allowed to become law without the president's signature. Individual laws, also called acts, are arranged by subject in the United States Code.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. A leader who is task-oriented and directs subordinates' work
.
Explanation:
The starting structure: Refers to the measure by which the leader can define and structure his role and those of his subordinates, in the pursuit of goal achievement. It includes behavior that tries to organize work, work relationships, and goals.
Extensive research, based on these definitions, shows that leaders with high rates of starting structure and consideration (a "high - high" leader) tend to achieve high performance and subordinate satisfaction, more often than those who rate low either in consideration, starting structure or in both dimensions. It does not always result in positive consequences to high rates of truancy and turnover, as well as low levels of job satisfaction for workers performing routine tasks. In conclusion, the Ohio State studies emerged that "high - high style" generally produced positive results.
