<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
Answer:
the fact that tenements were built with little concern for the people who would live in them
the fact that tenements were overcrowded
the fact that tenement conditions led to disease and death
It challenged the power of judicial review but was unsuccessful. It was an example of the Supreme Court ruling a law unconstitutional. It challenged the power of judicial review and caused it to be revoked. It was an example of Congress amending the Constitution.
Answer: the company cut their wages
The company extended their hours
Rent goods in town were to expensive
Explanation:
The crime was at its peak in the 18th century mainly because of industrial revolution. Which increase poverty and deviance at the same time.
The view changed in 19th century since many states started to build State penitentiaries
hope this helps
