Answer:
$10,400 Favorable
Explanation:
The computation of labor efficiency variance for June is shown below:-
For computing the labor efficiency variance for June first we need to find out the standard hours
Standard hours = 0.5 hours per unit × 3,100 units
= 1,550 hours
Now, we will put it into formula
Labor efficiency variance = (Standard hours - Actual hours) × Standard rate
= (1,550 - 510) × $10
= $10,400 Favorable
Therefore for computing the labor efficiency variance for June we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Generally Acceptable Accounting Principles (GAAP) is only applicable in the United States of America whereas International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has been adopted by most countries on the globe. This makes Report prepared on IFRS more comparable and make it easier to raise capital globally.
Answer:
3 and 46.67 units
Explanation:
The formula and the computations are shown below:
The price of good B is
= {The price of good Z (Pz)} ÷ {Marginal rate of transformation}
= {$6} ÷ {2}
= 3
Now the number of units to be purchased for all income used is
= (Monthly income spent on two goods) ÷ (price of good B)
= ($140) ÷ (3)
= 46.67 units
By applying the above formula we can find out the price of good B and the number of units purchased
Answer:
B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s.
Explanation:
This choice is based on the theory of production capacity, which tries to explain that industrial capacity of companies increases with increased supply of production resources. Capital is one of the production resources which is increased with increased supply of US dollars. Increased money supply increases the capital which banks can lend out to companies to increase their production capacity.
On the other hand, where this to be based on the theory of inflation, a different answer would have been produced. The theory of inflation recognizes that the average inflation rate increases proportionately to a percentage increase in money supply, among other factors that influence inflation rates.
That the price level in 2005 would have been about 28 percent higher than what it actually reached in that year is highly speculative. And D is certainly not the correct option, because the economy's output is increased with increased production capacity caused by increased money supply.
