Answer:
Food-service management
Explanation:
The International Council On Hotel, Restaurant & Institutional Education (I-CHRIE) was founded in 1946 as a non-profit organization for schools offering programs in hotel and restaurant management, food service management and culinary arts.
Hence, Lionel haven joined the International Council on Hotel, Restaurant and Institutional Education for career guidance is aspiring for a profession in hospitality or food-service management.
Answer:
A) $0
Explanation:
as per IRC section 101g, if the payment exceeds the greater of per actual cost then the excess payment amount will be taxable.
total tax free payment = 360*30
= $10,800
Therefore, The taxable amount is $0
Answer:
vertical integration strategy
Explanation:
In supply chain management, vertical integration refers to expanding the company's operations to either include some of its vendors, distributors and retailers, or both. This way, the company will be able to control the upstream of the supply chain management (vendors) and/or the downstream (distributors and retailers).
In this case, Beatrice is advocating for a vertical integration strategy in order for the company to expand into dairy farms. This way they company will control the supply of raw milk.
Explanation:
The journal entry to record the uncollectible is shown below:
On December 31
Bad debt expense $800
To Allowance for doubtful debts $800
(Being the bad debt expense is recorded)
The computation is shown below:
= Sales × estimated percentage - credit balance of doubtful accounts
= $280,000 × 0.5% - $600
= $1,400 - $600
= $800
Answer:
The correct answer is b) American will leave fares unchanged and Southwest will leave fares unchanged.
Explanation:
The Nash Balance is a situation where individuals or players have no incentive to change their strategy taking into account the strategy of their opponents.
In the Nash equilibrium, the strategy chosen by each participant of a conflict or game is optimal, given the strategy chosen by the others. In other words, nobody will gain anything if they decide to change their strategy under the assumption that the other individuals do not change theirs.
It should be noted that under the Nash equilibrium the greatest gain is not necessarily obtained for all individuals or players as a whole. It is only true that each responds optimally to the strategy of others. In many cases, individuals would like to be able to reach another balance with higher profits but fail to do so because they face the risk of being betrayed.
