Answer:
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
b. $69,754
Explanation:
contribution = sales - variable cost
for Product B32L:
contribution = sales - variable cost
= 46,000 - 13800
= $32,200
for Product K84B:
contribution = sales - variable cost
= 27,000 - 14,670
= $12,330
total sales of the company = 46,000 + 27,000
= $73,000
total contribution of the company = $32,200 + $12,330
= $44,530
cotribution margin ratio = contribution/sales
= 44530/73000
= 0.61
break even point = fixed cost/cotribution margin ratio
= 42550/0.61
= $69,754
Therefore, The The break-even point for the entire company is closest to $69,754.
Answer:
d. $1,540 F
Explanation:
The formula to compute the variable overhead efficiency variance is shown below:
= (Actual direct labor hours - standard direct labor hours) × variable overhead per hour
where,
Actual direct labor hours is 2,380
And, the standard direct labor hours equal to
= 5,200 units × 0.5
= 2,600 hours
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would equal to
= (2,380 hours - 2,600 hours) × $7
= 1,540 favorable
Answer:
Richard should have use <u>b</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>v</u><u>i</u><u>t</u><u>y</u> and <u>p</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>c</u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u>i</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u> </u>in his ad to make it better.
Explanation:
Brevity is similar to shortness and percision is the most suitable answer because fluidity means changable and the comparability mean it can be similar and comparable
Answer:
Even if Anna's grandparents provided the remaining $14,000 of support for Anna ($34,000 minus $12,000 minus $8,000) they would not be able to claim her as a dependent.
Explanation:
If the grandparents provided $14,000 their contribution to Anna's school fees is not up to half so they cannot claim Anna as an exemption. Anna had $12,000 personal money and $8,000 scholarship, it is crowned that she provided $20,000 by herself.
However since she is under the age of 21 and in college, her parents can claim her.
Bias may be occurring. Bias is basically thinking someone is better than another person due to one factor, without even knowing the person. In this instance, the store manager is only hiring shift supervisors who have a degree, rather than an experienced cashier without a degree. The bias here is dependent on the employee's educational history. The manager may think that even though the cashiers are great, they still may not have the qualifications that one would pick up in college.
