Answer:
If i was Martha i would donate the money to the Hunger Task Force, since he left no written will and told no one else about the money, it wouldnt effect anything if the money was donated to SPACE or Hunger Task Force other than people go hungry if she doesnt. It is going to a good cause after all
Answer:
1. The ecosystem would eventually return to its original state
Explanation:
There is a whole part of ecology concerned about the effects fires have on the ecosystem and its processes.<u> It has been determined that most of the ecosystems are very renewable, managing to return to the previous state after the fires. </u>
For nature, fires are the normal process and the ecosystem is therefore adaptable to them. They manage to help the soil, clean out the litter, and shape the environment for regrowth. There are even species of animals and plants whose existence and reproduction is connected to the fires.
With human interventions in both starting and suppressing the fires, the ecosystem is disrupted and there is less chance of renewal.
Answer: Low involvement decision
Explanation: When consumers make relatively easy and straightforward decisions making purchases which are routine and do especially not involve a lot of technicalities characterizes a low involvement decision. Low involvement decision are usually short as they pose very little risk from a financial and psychological perspective. The cost or financial implications is usually lower than that which involves high involvement decisions.
In the scenario above, Ben is making a fairly routine purchase as it is something he buys everyday at the train station. Also cost and technicalities required to purchase donut and coffee cannot be compared with that required when purchasinggoods like cars, estate and so on which require high involvement decision.
i am so sorry im taking up the answer spot but i have to say the answer is not d im not sure what it is but its not d!
