It beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 'b'
Answer:
The conflict theorist would argue from the point of view of the society being in perpetual competition as a result of inequality of distribution of resources and power. The rich would not pave the way for cheaper technology as a result of them purchasing early version of expensive technologies but rather, everyone would aspire to be the first to buy such early version of technology due to prestige associated with it.
On the long run, the conflict theorists makes more sense due to the fact that, as more people aspire to buy the early version of technologies, it creates extraordinary demand for the goods. this would force the manufacturers to employ more workers inorder to meet up with the demand thereby leading to fall in the prices of such goods. An example is the Toyota brand cars that is popular in some countries.
Explanation:
This is the NEGLIGENCE on the part of Dave. If he sold alcohol to the minor, Dave can face the charges of criminal negligence. If it was a property contract, or anything similar to that, then Dve will be charged under civil negligence. He will face the charges even what he did was not intentional.
Option A
These include athletes being more extraverted and conscientious and less neurotic than non athletes
<u>Explanation:</u>
The athletes have a more formidable spirit, more prolonging, greater self-conceit, and a more powerful strength goal than non-athletes. Athletes have added positive oneself features than non-athletes. Athletes vary from nonathletes on multiple personality attributes. One of the several constant conclusions is that athletes are higher extraverted and slightly erratic than non-athletes.
Still, there is a more limited understanding of how personality changes from sport to sport. Athletes who compete in crew and specific sports are more confident, stronger unbiased, and few afraid than nonathletes
Answer:
Private Acceptance
Explanation:
Private acceptance is an attitudinal alteration usually not expressed in deeds, action and words in public as it explains and espouses informational social consent, amounting to influence of the cognition to accept the influence of a group of norm in changing ones behavior. It differs from public compliance , which can be seen as superficial and can be seen as transient or transitionary change in behavior as a result of coercion and social influence.
