Answer:
$929,404.15 (approx)
Explanation:
The dollar amount actually earned by Solartech after exchanging yen for U.S. dollars :-
= Price ÷ One dollar bought
= 143,500,000 ÷ $154.40 yen
= 143,500,000 ÷ $154.40 yen
= $929,404.15 (approx)
Therefore for computing the dollar amount actually earned by Solartech after exchanging yen for U.S. dollars, we simply divide price by one dollar bought.
Answer:
$96,850
Explanation:
The net worth refers to the value of all the assets owned by a person or entity minus the value of all the liabilities. In Lana's case the assets are:
House $325,000
Guitar $750
Car $15,000
Stock investments $8,000
Savings Account $2,100
Total value of assets: $350,850
Lana's Liabilities:
Mortgage $245,000
Car loans $9,000
Total value of liabilities: $254,000
So, Lana's net worth would be:
$350,850-$254,000= $96,850
Answer:
There are several ways in which a young entrepreneur can carry out purchasing activities responsibly, including:
1. Measured production of inventory or units of products- If an entrepreneur is producing bicycles for instance, (s)he should only spend on inventory that (s)he anticipates will be sold to customers or purchased by retailers. For example, let's assume that the entrepreneur has a purchase order from a retailer such as K-Mart for 500 bicycles. In this case the entrepreneur should only produce around 550 bicycles rather than 700 or 1000 bikes, thus, purchasing supplies and producing inventory in accordance with demand for his/ her bicycles.
2. Lowering costs of production where possible- Firstly, this can be done by purchasing supplies and materials for inventory in bulk. Secondly, the entrepreneur could outsource the manufacturing of his/her product to countries (such as China) where production costs are significantly cheaper.
Answer:
E) while beer is homogeneous, the product is differentiated among the sellers.
Explanation: The beers are quite identical but each seller differentiates it
Answer: State Law.
Explanation:
This dispute falls under the jurisdiction of state law and so that is what the court will use. This is unless the company established a profit-sharing agreement as per the Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (ULLCA) and the state that they are in is one of the 19 states and District that enacted the UCCLA.
As the company never established a profit agreement principle, this falls under State law which normally calls for the division of profits equally amongst partners.
