answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
saw5 [17]
2 years ago
9

A different coffee seller offered to sell coffee to Jenae's company for half the cost of their current brand. Jenae knew her co-

workers were really partial to the coffee they drank now, so she decided to conduct a study to see if they noticed the difference in flavor. Her co-workers were convinced they would. Jenae provided each person with a sample and said that some had the new coffee and some did not. Only Jenae knew who had which brand of coffee.
Jenae's strategy is an example of a(n) ________.

a. randomized experiment
b. blind experiment
c. completely randomized experiment
d. matched-pair designed experiment
Mathematics
1 answer:
scZoUnD [109]2 years ago
8 0

Answer: B. Blind experiment

Step-by-step explanation: While conducting an experiment, experimenters may aim to eliminate factors which are very likely to cause bias and hence affect the veracity of the study. In the scenario above, the participants of the study (coworkers) were only provided with samples of the two coffee types without any of them knowing if it was the coffee they drank now or the new coffee brand. Hence, withholding such information from the participant is a technique in experimenting called blinding. Because, the information could affect the outcome and hence objective of the study as the participants were already partial towards the present coffee being consumed.

You might be interested in
A quotient is considered rationalized if its denominator contains no
FinnZ [79.3K]

Answer:

  radicals or complex numbers

Step-by-step explanation:

A "rationalized" denominator consists entirely of a real number or variable expression with real coefficients. Preferably, any number(s) will be integer(s).

4 0
2 years ago
A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored
pickupchik [31]

Answer:

We conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

Step-by-step explanation:

<u>The complete question is</u>: A nationwide sample of influential Republicans and Democrats was asked as a part of a comprehensive survey whether they favored lowering environmental standards so that high-sulfur coal could be burned in coal-fired power plants. The results were:

Number sampled: 1,000 (republican) , 800 (democrats)

Number in favor: 200 (republican) , 168 (democrats)

At the 0.02 level of significance, can we conclude that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards? Determine the p-value.

Let p_1 = <u><em>proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards</em></u>.

p_2 = <u><em>proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards</em></u>.

SO, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : p_1 \geq p_2     {means that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : p_1 < p_2     {means that there is a larger proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards}

The test statistics that would be used here <u>Two-sample z-test for</u> <u>proportions</u>;

                         T.S. =  \frac{(\hat p_1-\hat p_2)-(p_1-p_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p_1(1-\hat p_1)}{n_1}+\frac{\hat p_2(1-\hat p_2)}{n_2} } }  ~ N(0,1)

where, \hat p_1 = sample proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards = \frac{200}{1000} = 0.20

\hat p_2 = sample proportion of Democrats in favor of lowering the standards = \frac{168}{800} = 0.21

n_1 = sample of Republicans = 1000

n_2 = sample of Democrats = 800

So, <u><em>the test statistics</em></u>  =  \frac{(0.20-0.21)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{0.20(1-0.20)}{1000}+\frac{0.21(1-0.21)}{800} } }

                                     =  -0.52

The value of z test statistics is -0.52.

<u>Now, P-value of the test statistics is given by the following formula; </u>

            P-value = P(Z < -0.52) = 1 - P(Z \leq 0.52)

                          = 1 - 0.6985 = 0.3015

Now, at 0.02 significance level, the z table gives a critical value of -2.054 for left-tailed test.

Since our test statistic is more than the critical value of z as -0.52 > -2.054, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which <em><u>we fail to reject our null hypothesis</u></em>.

Therefore, we conclude that there is an equal or larger proportion of Republicans in favor of lowering the standards.

7 0
2 years ago
there are 96 carrots in a bag. the carrots are shared among three children in the ratio 4:5:7. find the smallest share
mars1129 [50]
Lets make it
4x+5x+7x=96
so we can tell the smallest share is 4x
then we 16x=96
96 divided by 16, we get x=6
so the smallest share is 4x6=24
hope it can help
8 0
2 years ago
the temperature of a liquid in an experiment starts a 0 degrees celsius. the experiment calls for the temperature of liquid to c
marin [14]

Answer:

It will take 13.5 minutes for the liquid to reach - 10.8°C.

Step-by-step explanation:

The initial temperature of the experiment is 0°C and as the experiment goes on, the temperature of the liquid is changing at a rate of - 0.8°C per minute.

So, the equation that models the situation is  

T = 0 - 0.8t

⇒ T = - 0.8t ................. (1)

Where T is the temperature of the liquid in °C and t is the time of spending after the experiment starts in minutes.

Now, given T = - 10.8°C and we have to find the corresponding time (t) in minutes.

So, from equation (1) we get,  

- 10.8 = - 0.8t

⇒ t = 13.5 minutes

Therefore, it will take 13.5 minutes for the liquid to reach - 10.8°C. (Answer)

3 0
2 years ago
Following a severe​ snowstorm, Ken and Bettina Reeves must clear their driveway and sidewalk.Ken can clear the snow by himself i
bija089 [108]

Determine how much of the job they have finished by calculating:

2/4 + 2/6 = 1/2 + 1/3 = 5/6 of the job has been done.

So, they have 1/6 of the job to go.

Then we write the following fractional equation:

t/4 + t/6 = 1/6

Multiply all by 12 (the LCD) and get

3t + 2t = 2

5t = 2

t = 2/5 hour = 24 minutes.

Understand?

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Simplest form of 1.04:0.26
    14·2 answers
  • Bill Payne visits his local bank to see how long it will take for $1,000 to amount to $1,900 at a simple interest rate of 12 ½%.
    14·1 answer
  • A professor wants to determine information about the Internet usage of middle school students in one state. A sample of 500 boys
    14·2 answers
  • What is the value of minus 6 x cubed minus y squared minus 3 x y if if x = -2 and y = 4
    5·2 answers
  • Suppose a teacher gives 10 points for putting your name on a 100 point test. The minimum score on that test is 10 and the maximu
    10·1 answer
  • . For each of these intervals, list all its elements or explain why it is empty. a) [a, a] b) [a, a) c) (a, a] d) (a, a) e) (a,
    5·1 answer
  • For a certain type of copper wire, it is knownthat, on the average, 1.5 flaws occur per millimeter.Assuming that the number of f
    14·1 answer
  • Through bond sales, a nation's central bank pulls money out of circulation. One of the short-term effects is to drive the price
    9·1 answer
  • Mason cuts a giant circular cookie into 5 equal pieces. Which statements are true about the angle measures of the pieces? Select
    11·2 answers
  • Sarah invested $800 in an account paying an interest rate of 3.5% compounded quarterly. Assuming no deposits or withdrawals are
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!