Answer:
B. The cost of tour t is at most twice the cost of the optimal tour.
Explanation:
You are using a polynomial time 2-approximation algorithm to find a tour t for the traveling salesman problem.
The cost of tour t is at most twice the cost of the optimal tour
The equation represented as Cost(t) <= 2 Cost(T)
Where
Cost (t) represents cost of tour t
Cost(T) represents cost of the optimal tour
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class CarCounter {
public:
CarCounter();
CarCounter(const CarCounter& origCarCounter);
void SetCarCount(const int count) {
carCount = count;
}
int GetCarCount() const {
return carCount;
}
private:
int carCount;
};
CarCounter::CarCounter() {
carCount = 0;
return;
}
CarCounter::CarCounter(const CarCounter &p){
carCount = p.carCount;
}
void CountPrinter(CarCounter carCntr) {
cout << "Cars counted: " << carCntr.GetCarCount();
return;
}
int main() {
CarCounter parkingLot;
parkingLot.SetCarCount(5);
CountPrinter(parkingLot);
return 0;
}
Sample output:
Cars Counted: 5
The risk vulnerability assessment is the answer
The correct answer is
A. the incorporation of technology into objects we use regularly
#Platogang
The answer in this question is that once the Adaptor or router received the destination IP address (even if we entered in the incorrect MAC address) the router or adapter would remove the IP address from the Ethernet frame and using ARP, would get the correct MAC address of the destination.
