Answer:
2*10 ^6 shoes in 10 years
Step-by-step explanation:
1.81 × 10^4 pairs of shoes each month
1.2 × 10^2 months in 10 years
Multiply these together to determine the number of shoes in 10 years
1.81 × 10^4 * 1.2 × 10^2
We want to estimate so 1.81 is approximately 2 and 1.2 is approximately 1
2 × 10^4 * 1 × 10^2
Multiply the numbers
2*1 = 2
Add the exponent
10 ^ ( 4+2)
10 ^6
Put this back together
2*10 ^6
Answer:
Brian had $30 initially.Brian had $30 initially.
Step-by-step explanation:
WE are given the following in the question:
Let Brian have x dollars and Colin have y dollars.
Ration of Brian's money to Colin's money is 5:1. This, we can write the equation:
"Brian spent £27 that day. Brian now had £3 less than Colin."
Thus, we can write the equation:
Solving the two equation by substitution, we get,
Thus, Brian had $30 initially.
well if it asks you to send to 4 people and there are 8 generations which includes yours that mean
1 sent to 4 - 4 recived
4 send to 4 each = 16 recived + the 4 before = 20 (generation 2)
16 send to 4 = 64 + 20 = 84 (generation 3)
64 send to 4 = 256 + 84= 320 (g4)
256 send to 4 = 1024 + 320 = 1344 (g5)
1344 s t 4 = 5376 + 1344= 6730 (g6)
so on and so forth till generation 8
Answer:
- Andre subtracted 3x from both sides
- Diego subtracted 2x from both sides
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Andre</u>
Comparing the result of Andre's work with the original, we see that the "3x" term on the right is missing, and the x-term on the left is 3x less than it was. It is clear that Andre subtracted 3x from both sides of the equation.
__
<u>Diego</u>
Comparing the result of Diego's work with the original, we see that the "2x" term on the left is missing, and the x-term on the right is 2x less than it was. It is clear that Diego subtracted 2x from both sides of the equation.
_____
<em>Comment on their work</em>
IMO, Diego has the right idea, as his result leaves the x-term with a positive coefficient. He can add 8 and he's finished, having found that x=14.
Andre can subtract 6 to isolate the variable term, and that will give him -x=-14. This requires another step to get to x=14. Sometimes minus signs get lost, so this would not be my preferred sequence of steps.
As a rule, I like to add the opposite of the variable term with the least (most negative) coefficient. This results in the variable having a positive coefficient, making errors easier to avoid.
