Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

9

Nicole is 56 inches tall and has an 84 inch shadow. Julie is standing next to Nicole and has a 96 inch shadow. How tall is Julie

?

1 answer:

Natalka [10]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

56+12=68. 68 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

julie‘s shadow is 12 inches taller than Nicole’ so you would just add 12 to 56.

You might be interested in

At a bake shop, the cost of flour is $2.50 per pound and increases at a rate of $0.07 per month. The cost of cocoa is $6.00 per

Vesna [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We will find two equations for this system, one representing flour and the other representing cocoa. For the flour, we start with $2.50, and the cost goes up .07 per month, x. The equation for that is

y = .07x + 2.50

For the cocoa, the equation is written in the exact same way, but the cost goes down. Down is a negative thing while up is a positive thing. The cost starts at $6.00 and goes down .03 per month, x. The equation for that is

y = -.03x + 6.00

Comparing the first equation to the second, the .07 is positive because the cost goes UP that amount per month and the .03 is negative because the cost goes DOWN that amount per month. Get it?

If y is cost and we are tryong to find out where the cost is the same, we are looking for when y is the same. If the first y is equal to .07x + 2.50 and the second y is equal to -.03x + 6.00, and y is equal to y, then

.07x + 2.50 = -.03x + 6.00 (this is setting the first y equal to the second y). This is the system that describes how to find the number of months x when the cost y is the same. We'll solve it just for practice.

Combining like terms we get

.10x = 3.5 so

x = 35

Now back sub in what x equals to solve for y. If x = 35, then in the first equation,

.07(35) + 2.50 = y and

y = 4.95 (you could have used the second equation and subbed in 35 for x and you will get the exact same y value. Promise!)

What this answer tells us is that 35 months after the start of this pricing, the cost of flour will be the same as the cost of cocoa. But immediately after 35 months, the costs will not be the same anymore. It is only AT 35 months. At 36 months, the costs will be different.

7 0

2 years ago

Carmen's golf score is 6 strokes less than Linda's. Their two scores total 156. What is each girls score?

DochEvi [55]

Answer:

Carmen's score is 75 strokes.

Linda's score is 81 strokes.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the score of Linda be "x".

<em>It is given that Carmen's golf score is 6 strokes less than Linda's.</em>

Thus, Carmen's score is (x-6).

The total score of the girls is

= $x + (x-6) = 2x-6$

The total score is given to be 156.

Thus, the equation becomes,

$2x-6 = 156$

$2x= 162$

$x = 81$

<em>Thus Linda's score is 81 and Carmen's score is (156-81) 75.</em>

5 0

2 years ago

Among a simple random sample of 331 American adults who do not have a four-year college degree and are not currently enrolled in

Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

(1) Therefore, a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who decide to not go to college because they cannot afford it is [0.4348, 0.5252].

(2) We can be 90% confident that the proportion of Americans who choose not to go to college because they cannot afford it is contained within our confidence interval

(3) A survey should include at least 3002 people if we wanted the margin of error for the 90% confidence level to be about 1.5%.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a simple random sample of 331 American adults who do not have a four-year college degree and are not currently enrolled in school, 48% said they decided not to go to college because they could not afford school.

Firstly, the pivotal quantity for finding the confidence interval for the population proportion is given by;

P.Q. = $\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ~ N(0,1)

where, $\hat p$ = sample proportion of Americans who decide to not go to college = 48%

n = sample of American adults = 331

p = population proportion of Americans who decide to not go to

college because they cannot afford it

<em>Here for constructing a 90% confidence interval we have used a One-sample z-test for proportions.</em>

<em />

<u>So, 90% confidence interval for the population proportion, p is ;</u>

P(-1.645 < N(0,1) < 1.645) = 0.90 {As the critical value of z at 5% level

of significance are -1.645 & 1.645}

P(-1.645 < $\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ < 1.645) = 0.90

P( $-1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ < $\hat p-p$ < $1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ) = 0.90

P( $\hat p-1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ < p < $\hat p+1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ) = 0.90

<u>90% confidence interval for p</u> = [ $\hat p-1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ , $\hat p+1.645 \times {\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }$ ]

= [ $0.48 -1.96 \times {\sqrt{\frac{0.48(1-0.48)}{331} } }$ , $0.48 +1.96 \times {\sqrt{\frac{0.48(1-0.48)}{331} } }$ ]

= [0.4348, 0.5252]

(1) Therefore, a 90% confidence interval for the proportion of Americans who decide to not go to college because they cannot afford it is [0.4348, 0.5252].

(2) The interpretation of the above confidence interval is that we can be 90% confident that the proportion of Americans who choose not to go to college because they cannot afford it is contained within our confidence interval.

3) Now, it is given that we wanted the margin of error for the 90% confidence level to be about 1.5%.

So, the margin of error = $Z_(_\frac{\alpha}{2}_) \times \sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} }$

$0.015 = 1.645 \times \sqrt{\frac{0.48(1-0.48)}{n} }$

$\sqrt{n} = \frac{1.645 \times \sqrt{0.48 \times 0.52} }{0.015}$

$\sqrt{n}$ = 54.79

n = $54.79^{2}$

n = 3001.88 ≈ 3002

Hence, a survey should include at least 3002 people if we wanted the margin of error for the 90% confidence level to be about 1.5%.

5 0

2 years ago

A deck of playing cards has four suits, with thirteen cards in each suit consisting of the numbers 2 through 10, a jack, a queen

Rudik [331]

A. True. There are 52 cards total and you only pick 5. Order doesn't matter.

-------------------------------------------

B. False. Order doesn't matter so you use a combination (instead of a permutation) as choice A shows.

-------------------------------------------

C. False. The answer is roughly 0.000858 as shown by the calculation below

(13/52)*(12/51)*(13/50)*(12/49)*(11/48) = 0.000858

-------------------------------------------

D. False. See calculation below

(13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(10/49)*(9/48) = 0.000495

-------------------------------------------

E. True. See calculation below

(13/52)*(12/51)*(11/50)*(10/49)*(9/48) = 0.000495
this value rounds to roughly 0.0005

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Joel is mailing a large envelope to his cousin. The envelope has pictures inside, so he doesn't want to bend it.

Nuetrik [128]

Answer: Put a cardboard piece inside the envelope then mail it

Step-by-step explanation: If you make the cardboard piece the exact size as the pictures then put it behind all of the pictures it would make it hard for the pictures to bend if it has support.

8 0

2 years ago