The answer is C.
Note when Soro divides both sides by -2.5 to solve the equation. When multiplying/dividing by a negative number, one should always reverse the inequality sign, but Soro forgot to do this.
-2.5x≥-30
After this step, the answer SHOULD HAVE been:
x≤12
Let me know if you need any clarifications, thanks!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The question is incomplete. Here is the complete question.
the batting wang xiu ying uses to fill quilts has a thermal conductivity rate of 0.03 watts (W) per meter(m) per degree celsius. what is the batting thermal conductivity when w/cm•c
Given
K = 0.03W/m°C
Required
Convert K to W/cm°C
Since 1m = 100cm,
K = 0.03w/1×100cm°C
K = 3×10^-2w/10² cm°C
K = 3 × 10^-2w/10² cm°C
K = 3w× 10^{-2-2}cm°C
K = 3w×10^-4cm°C
K = 0.0003w/cm°C
Answer: A or B
Step-by-step explanation:
Question
The table shows the heights in a basketball team.
Height: 198, 199, 200, 201, 202
a.) Work out the mean height of the team. Round you answer to 1d.p.
That, I have worked out is 200.3
b.) A new player joins the team and raises the mean average height to 201cm. Work out the height of the new player.
Answer:
206 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of the fiven numbers, 198+199+200+201+202=1000
For a mean of 201, the product should be 201*6=1206
The difference of the two is equivalent to the height of the other person hence 1206-1000=206 cm
Therefore, the height is 206 cm
Answer:
a: 28 < µ < 34
Step-by-step explanation:
We need the mean, var, and standard deviation for the data set. See first attached photo for calculations for these...
We get a mean of 222/7 = 31.7143
and a sample standard deviation of: 4.3079
We can now construct our confidence interval. See the second attached photo for the construction steps.
They want a 90% confidence interval. Our sample size is 7, so since n < 30, we will use a t-score. Look up the value under the 10% area in 2 tails column, and degree of freedom is 6 (degree of freedom is always 1 less than sample size for confidence intervals when n < 30)
The t-value is: 1.943
We rounded down to the nearest person in the interval because we don't want to over estimate. It said 28.55, so more than 28 but not quite 29, so if we use 29 as the lower limit, we could over estimate. It's better to use 28 and underestimate a little when considering customer flow.