<h2>
Answer:</h2>
The ratios of earnings to hours are not the same each week, so the earnings do not vary directly with the hours.
<h2>
Step-by-step explanation:</h2>
We know that the data points given by (x,y) are in direct variation if:
for each (x,y)
We are given data as:
Caleb’s Earnings Hours(x) 12 15 18 21
Earnings (in dollars)(y) 140 170 200 230
So, we could see the ratio as:
Hence, we could see that each ratio are not equal.
Hence, the relationship between the earnings and the number of hours does not represents a direct variation.
Answer:
The equation would be y = 3/2x - 1
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the answer in slope-intercept form, simply solve for y.
4x-4y/2=x+2 ----> Subtract 4x from both sides
-4y/2=-3x+2 ----> Multiply both sides by 2
-4y = -6x + 4 -----> Divide by -4
y = 3/2x - 1
Answer:
its c
Step-by-step explanation:
By the converse of the hinge theorem, mAngleS > mAngleC.
If the first expression reads x(cube) • x(cube) • x(cube) and x(cube • cube <span>• cube), then the answer is no. They are not equal.
</span>
x(cube) • x(cube) <span>• x(cube) will be equivalent to x(to the 9th power) while </span>x(cube • cube <span>• cube) will be equivalent to x( to the 27th power). </span><span>
</span>
First we calculate the ambio rate from x = 0 to x = 15:
We have:
R = ((80-10) / (0-15))
R = -4.666666667
We now calculate for the entire interval:
from x = 0 to x = 20:
R = ((80-2) / (0-20))
R = -3.9
Answer:
What is the average rate of change over the entire slide?
R = -3.9
The average rate of change from x = 0 to x = 15 is about -4.667. How does the average rate change from x = 0 to x = 20 compare to this number?
The percentage difference is:
(-3.9 / -4.666666667) * (100) = 83.57142857%
100-83.57142857 = 16.42857143%
